1989
DOI: 10.1300/j004v08n04_04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Concurrent Validity Study of Two Occupational Therapy Evaluation Instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have been predominantly focused on inpatient settings (8,22,23). This study illustrates that the OCAIRS-S (V2) can effectively measure a more able population with no floor effect and can be used in an outpatient setting to adequately measure service users' occupational participation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have been predominantly focused on inpatient settings (8,22,23). This study illustrates that the OCAIRS-S (V2) can effectively measure a more able population with no floor effect and can be used in an outpatient setting to adequately measure service users' occupational participation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therapists reported that the OCAIRS was very useful for understanding the clients. Brollier et al (8) also examined concurrent validity of the OCAIRS. Using a sample of 41 persons with schizophrenia, they found a moderate association (r = 0.55) between the OCAIRS and the Global Assessment Scale, a well-known measure of the degree of psychiatric illness.…”
Section: Research On the Ocairs (English Version)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has a 1-4 rating scale to assess roles, habits, personal causation, values, interests, skills, short-and long-term goals, interpretation of past experiences, physical environment, social environment, and readiness for change, and we used it as a pre-post effectiveness measure. The OCAIRS has been shown to have adequate concurrent validity (Brollier, Hawkins Watts, Bauer, & Schmidt, 1989) and excellent interrater reliability (Kielhofner, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brollier et al (6) also examined concurrent validity of the OCAIRS. Using a sample of 41 persons with schizophrenia, they found a moderate association (r = 0.55) between the OCAIRS and the Global Assessment Scale (7), a well-known measure of the degree of psychiatric illness.…”
Section: Pre6ious Research On the Ocairsmentioning
confidence: 99%