2017
DOI: 10.1167/17.10.967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A concurrent working memory load task does not impair visual selective attention: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not find memory effects either on the target factor or the set size factor, replicating previous findings in adulthood again (Downing and Dodds, 2004;Woodman and Luck, 2007;Quirós-Godoy et al, 2017). The interaction between target and set size is consistent with previous developmental studies (Donnelly et al, 2007;Michael et al, 2013;Woods et al, 2013;Brennan et al, 2017;Gil-Gómez de Liaño et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We did not find memory effects either on the target factor or the set size factor, replicating previous findings in adulthood again (Downing and Dodds, 2004;Woodman and Luck, 2007;Quirós-Godoy et al, 2017). The interaction between target and set size is consistent with previous developmental studies (Donnelly et al, 2007;Michael et al, 2013;Woods et al, 2013;Brennan et al, 2017;Gil-Gómez de Liaño et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Since to our knowledge this is the first study manipulating how working memory load can modulate visual search during childhood, we avoided any potential overlapping of images between working memory and visual search tasks. Under these circumstances, our results essentially show that the efficiency of visual search is not affected by the concurrent working memory load at any age from kindergarten to college, replicating previous findings in adulthood (Downing and Dodds, 2004;Woodman and Luck, 2007;Quirós-Godoy et al, 2017). Surprisingly, even for our youngest children, the load of a concurrent visual working memory task did not make an essential difference in visual search efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beck and Hollingworth [31] used a gaze-contingent search paradigm to manipulate selection history directly and examine the competition between multiple cue-matching saccade target objects. Quiros' et al conducted A meta-analysis to explore a concurrent working memory load task that does not impair visual selective attention [41]. These works can also provide inspiration to adjust visual information.…”
Section: Design Guideline and Its Practical Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%