2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2011.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A condensed semantics for qualitative spatial reasoning about oriented straight line segments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this higher dimensional setting, the calculus is based on the transformations of the so-called Frenet-Serret frames [28]. Other applications of the double-cross formalism and its generalisation OPRA n include the modelling of traffic situations [29,30].…”
Section: Introduction and Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this higher dimensional setting, the calculus is based on the transformations of the so-called Frenet-Serret frames [28]. Other applications of the double-cross formalism and its generalisation OPRA n include the modelling of traffic situations [29,30].…”
Section: Introduction and Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to obtain certainty that these calculi indeed violate R 4 , one has to find concrete counterexamples and verify them using the original definition of the respective calculus. For DRA f and INDU, this has been done in the literature [23,3]. Interestingly, the violation of associativity has been attributed to the absence of strong converse and strong composition, respectively.…”
Section: Algebraic Properties Of Existing Calculimentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, weak composition implies that each cell contains exactly those t. If composition is strong, then Rel and ϕ even have to ensure that whenever ϕ(t) intersects with ϕ(r) • ϕ(s), it is contained in ϕ(r) • ϕ(s) -i.e., the composition of the interpretation of any two base relations has to be the union of interpretations of certain base relations. [35] directions from a point 9 P a Variant DRAc is not based on a weak partition scheme -JEPD is violated [23].…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples for such RST calculi are the double-cross (Freksa, 1992), the flip-flop (Ligozat, 1993) (also called in Scivos and Nebel (2004), as shown in Figure 9) and the Ternary Point Configuration Calculus (TPCC; Moratz & Ragni, 2008). However, it has been proved (Wolter & Lee, 2010) that a qualitative calculus expressive enough to distinguish from left to right of including flip-flop (Ligozat, 1993), double-cross (Freksa, 1992), dipole (Moratz et al ., 2000), (Moratz, 2006) and TPCC (Moratz & Ragni, 2008), existing relation algebraic approach is too weak for deciding consistency problems and all reasonable sub-algebras remain NP-hard, that is, directional relation calculi are inherently intractable.
Figure 9Pictorial illustration of seven base relations in the calculus when . l, f, r, b and c stand for left, further, right, back and closer (Scivos & Nebel, 2004: 285)
…”
Section: Aspects Of Qualitative Spatial Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%