2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2013.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conjecture on Whittaker–Fourier coefficients of cusp forms

Abstract: Abstract. We formulate an analogue of the Ichino-Ikeda conjectures for the WhittakerFourier coefficients of automorphic forms on quasi-split reductive groups. This sharpens the conjectures of Sakellaridis-Venkatesh in the case at hand.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, when G 0 is the trivial group, the terms L. 1 2 ; 2 0 / and L.1; 0 ; Ad/ are both 1, then the refined formula computes the (square norm of the) Whittaker-Fourier coefficient. In this case, the refined formula has also been conjectured by Lapid-Mao [33] for more general groups; see Section 2.2 for details. The extra constant term 1=jS ‰ j relates to the Arthur parameter ‰ of 2 0 , which was first observed by Ichino-Ikeda after summarizing many low-rank examples in the case r D 0.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…In particular, when G 0 is the trivial group, the terms L. 1 2 ; 2 0 / and L.1; 0 ; Ad/ are both 1, then the refined formula computes the (square norm of the) Whittaker-Fourier coefficient. In this case, the refined formula has also been conjectured by Lapid-Mao [33] for more general groups; see Section 2.2 for details. The extra constant term 1=jS ‰ j relates to the Arthur parameter ‰ of 2 0 , which was first observed by Ichino-Ikeda after summarizing many low-rank examples in the case r D 0.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…where ∆ G,S = w∈S ∆ G,w . It is well known that this integral converges and defines a G( [LM15,p. 477] which is of course based on [JS81]) provided that S is a finite set of places of E containing all the archimedean ones as well as all the non-archimedean places for which either ϕ or ϕ ∨ is not…”
Section: The Whittaker Realization Of the Petersson Inner Product Gimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Suppose that F is a non-archimedean local field. We consider the notion of a stable integral as defined in [13]. We refer the reader to there for more information since it is not of central importance to our discussion.…”
Section: Local Integralsmentioning
confidence: 99%