2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11102-012-0420-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly complications

Abstract: In March 2011, the Acromegaly Consensus Group met to revise and update the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly complications. The meeting was sponsored by the Pituitary Society and the European Neuroendocrinology Association and included experts skilled in the management of acromegaly. Complications considered included cardiovascular, endocrine and metabolic, sleep apnea, bone diseases, and mortality. Outcomes in selected, related clinical conditions were also considered, and included pregn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

5
210
1
23

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
5
210
1
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Different series have noted a relatively high prevalence (45-80 %), which is significantly higher than that of the general population (2-4 %) [1,2], although it is probably still under-assessed [3]. In this setting, a recent consensus on acromegaly complications stated that every patient should undergo a careful symptomatic [for example, with an Epworth Sleepiness scale score (ESS)] and/or laboratory assessment for SAS at the time of diagnosis, in collaboration with a respiratory physician [3]. Obstructive SAS (OSAS) is the prevailing form in acromegaly; this occurs due to craniofacial deformations, hypertrophy of pharyngeal soft tissue, macroglossia and thickening of upper airway, all of which hamper the airflow through upper airways.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different series have noted a relatively high prevalence (45-80 %), which is significantly higher than that of the general population (2-4 %) [1,2], although it is probably still under-assessed [3]. In this setting, a recent consensus on acromegaly complications stated that every patient should undergo a careful symptomatic [for example, with an Epworth Sleepiness scale score (ESS)] and/or laboratory assessment for SAS at the time of diagnosis, in collaboration with a respiratory physician [3]. Obstructive SAS (OSAS) is the prevailing form in acromegaly; this occurs due to craniofacial deformations, hypertrophy of pharyngeal soft tissue, macroglossia and thickening of upper airway, all of which hamper the airflow through upper airways.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This inconsistency regarding the resolution of SAS despite successful acromegaly treatment advocates for the need to perform a post-treatment evaluation, as it was recommended by the Acromegaly Consensus Group [3], not only in patients with partial or no response to GHlowering therapies, but also after biochemical normalization. When biochemical control is achievable, soft tissue hypertrophy may reverse and OSAS may improve with acromegaly-directed treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surgical, pharmacological and radiotherapeutic approaches are used to treat acromegaly, and consensus statements and guidelines on acromegaly management and management of complications have been updated. [4][5][6][7] Moreover, during the 2013 meeting, detailed guidance on pharmacological options for acromegaly treatment was revisited by the group and current recommendations are presented here. Recommendations were graded on the basis of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system (Box 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the exact role of vitamin D deficiency in the pathogenesis of GH excess-induced skeletal fragility is still unknown, low vitamin D values were associated with vertebral fractures in post-menopausal women [27] but not in males [28] with acromegaly and correction of vitamin D deficiency has been recommended as one of main measures in the management of skeletal fragility in this clinical setting [29]. Unfortunately, the study of Altinova et al did not provide data concerning skeletal health in their acromegaly patients [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%