2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conservative orbital advection scheme for simulations of magnetized shear flows with the PLUTO code

Abstract: Context. Explicit numerical computations of hypersonic or super-fast differentially rotating disks are subject to the time-step constraint imposed by the Courant condition, according to which waves cannot travel more than a fraction of a cell during a single time-step update. When the bulk orbital velocity largely exceeds any other wave speed (e.g., sound or Alfvén), as computed in the rest frame, the time step is considerably reduced and an unusually large number of steps may be necessary to complete the comp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
98
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first three codes in the list have been used and described in de Val-Borro et al (2006). The last code, PLUTO, is a multidimensional Riemann-solver based code for magnetohydrodynamical flows (Mignone et al 2007), which has been empowered recently with the FARGO-algorithm (Mignone et al 2012).…”
Section: Numerical Methods and Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first three codes in the list have been used and described in de Val-Borro et al (2006). The last code, PLUTO, is a multidimensional Riemann-solver based code for magnetohydrodynamical flows (Mignone et al 2007), which has been empowered recently with the FARGO-algorithm (Mignone et al 2012).…”
Section: Numerical Methods and Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, similar orbital advection algorithms have been implemented into a variety of different codes in two and three spatial dimensions, e.g. NIRVANA (Ziegler & Yorke 1997;Kley et al 2009), ATHENA (Gardiner & Stone 2008;Stone & Gardiner 2010), and PLUTO (Mignone et al 2007(Mignone et al , 2012. Despite these widespread applications, it has been claimed recently that usage of the FARGO-algorithm (here in connection with ATHENA) may lead to an unsteady behavior of the flow near the planet, which even affects the wake structure of the flow farther away from the planet (Dong et al 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that for our simulations the options were chosen such that algorithm was applied using the residual azimuthal velocity with respect to the initial azimuthal velocity, the latter not being updated. A sample of runs were checked carefully to confirm numerical stability and that consistent results were obtained (see also Mignone et al 2012 for a comparison of this type). For the calculations reported here, we adopt a locally isothermal equation of state for which cs ∝ r −1/2 .…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mignone et al 2012, Uribe et al 2013. The planet positions are advanced using a fourth order Runge-Kutta method which however assumes that the forces due to the disc do not change as the planet locations are advanced through a time step, making the method one of lower order (see e.g.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PLUTO code is a highly modular, multidimensional, and multi-geometry code that can be applied to relativistic or non-relativistic (magneto-)hydrodynamics flows. For this work we chose the Godunov-type finite volume configuration which consists of a second order space reconstruction, a second-order Runge-Kutta time integration, the constrained transport (CT) method (Gardiner & Stone 2005), the orbital advection scheme FARGO MHD (Masset 2000;Mignone et al 2012), the HLLD Riemann solver (Miyoshi & Kusano 2005), and a Courant number of 0.3. In this work we neglect the magnetic dissipation which would appear at the right-hand side of Eq.…”
Section: Equations and Numerical Schemementioning
confidence: 99%