Class I peptide release factors 1 and 2 (RF1 and RF2) recognize the stop codons in the ribosomal decoding center and catalyze peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis. High-fidelity stop codon recognition by these release factors is essential for accurate peptide synthesis and ribosome recycling. X-ray crystal structures of RF1 and RF2 bound to the ribosome have identified residues in the mRNAprotein interface that appear critical for stop codon recognition. Especially interesting is a conserved histidine in all bacterial class I release factors that forms a stacking interaction with the second base of the stop codon. Here we analyzed the functional significance of this conserved histidine (197 in E. coli) of RF1 by point mutagenesis to alanine. Equilibrium binding studies and transient-state kinetic analysis have shown that the histidine is essential for binding with high affinity to the ribosome. Furthermore, analysis of the binding data indicates a conformational change within the RF1•ribosome complex that results in a more tightly bound state. The rate of peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis was also reduced significantly, more than the binding data would suggest, implying a defect in the orientation of the GGQ domain without the histidine residue.
KeywordsRibosome; release factor; stop codon; translation; termination The entry of a stop codon into the ribosomal A site signals the termination phase of protein synthesis. The nearly universally conserved stop codons UAA, UAG, and UGA are recognized by class I release factors (RFs) (1). In bacteria, there are two class I release factors: RF1 and RF2. RF1 recognizes UAA and UAG, while RF2 recognizes UAA and UGA (2). In eukaryotes, a single class I release factor, eRF1, recognizes all three stop codons (3). Following the recognition of the stop codon in the A site, class I release factors trigger peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis and the release of the newly synthesized protein from the ribosome (4). Accurate recognition of stop codons by RFs is essential to prevent premature termination, which would be costly to the cell. The fidelity of stop codon recognition by RFs has been estimated to be 1 x 10 −3 to 1 x 10 −6 (5,6), which is arguably more accurate than tRNA selection on cognate codons. Remarkably, this high level of accuracy in stop codon recognition is achieved by RFs without the help of a proofreading mechanism.Previously, the kinetics of RF1 and RF2 discrimination between stop and sense codons were systematically analyzed under steady state conditions (6). These studies showed that a sense codon in the decoding center increases the K M between the release factors and the ribosome by 400-3000-fold, while the catalytic rate constant for peptide release (k cat ) was reduced by More recently, the binding of RF1 to ribosomes with stop or sense codons in the decoding center was directly measured using a fluorescence-based, pre-steady state kinetic assay (7). These studies showed that the association rate constant of RF1 with the ribosome is similar with both sense and stop codons, while t...