Gene perturbation is the standard strategy to elucidate gene function and it can be achieved by both knockout and mis-regulation approaches. The dramatic impact of aneuploidies in human and other model organism illustrates the importance of gene dosage for proper gene function (Sheltzer & Amon, 2011). In those instances, gene copy number variation without alteration to the basic genetic material is sufficient to cause a phenotype (Prelich, 2012;Tang & Amon, 2013). Naturally, molecular approaches aiming at either abolishing (knockout), reducing (knockdown), or increasing (overexpression) gene expression are commonly used by geneticists to decipher the role of a specific gene. The gene knockout strategy, used to understand the function of a gene through loss-of-function, faces several limitations: (a) many genes are expressed in a nichedependent manner, and thus the phenotypic effect linked to the absence of such genes can only be achieved in the specific conditions under which the gene is expressed; (b) the presence of functionally redundant genes will hamper the efficiency of such an approach when working with gene families; (c) the technical challenge of implementing knockout approaches in diploid organisms; and (d) only non-essential genes can be studied by knockout approaches (unless using conditional knockout approaches). Alternatively, gene overexpression has been exploited by geneticists to understand biological pathways as a parallel approach to the loss-of-function approach. By altering cellular localization, complex stoichiometry or proper expression regulation, overexpression of a gene could result in a phenotype that would provide information about the gene function.