The dispersion of water inside a flow of oil is investigated in a microfluidic device, producing a water-in-oil emulsion. The liquid-liquid flow mainly differs from those presented in existing literature through its high capillary number (between 3 and 14), and in the head-on collision between water and oil streams. By comparing with experimental data, numerical simulations can provide more information about the topology of the flow. A coupled Volume of Fluid and Level Set method (CLSVOF) is used to treat the interface between both phases and incompressible Navier-Stokes equations are solved. Three set of parameters, close to those in the experimental setup, are investigated to compare experimental and numerical results. The comparison between experiments and simulation provides a precise knowledge of the liquid-liquid dispersion process and the overall flow pattern within the microfluidic device.
KeywordsMicrochannel, water-in-oil dispersion, liquid-liquid flow Introduction Liquid-liquid dispersion within microfluidic devices has become an important issue over the last decade [1]. An emulsion is defined as the temporarily stable dispersion of a liquid into another one that is not miscible [2]. When the scale of the liquid-liquid flow is smaller than its capillary length [3], interfacial tension dominates over shear stress and gravity [4], making the dispersion highly reproducible in slow conditions [5]. These slow conditions ensure a highly monodisperse emulsion [6], that is usually appropriate for targeted applications like microreaction synthesis [7]. However, other application like high flow-rate biofuel production [8] benefit from the considerably increased surface-to-volume ratio [9,10] of microfluidic liquid-liquid dispersion. In order to better understand the physics of microfluidic in high flow-rate liquid-liquid dispersion, experimental results of the obtained mean diameter and liquid-liquid flow photographies [8] are compared to numerical results. At the present stage, a quantitative validation of the model is not obtained, but we present a qualitative comparison of the liquid-liquid flow pattern. In a first part, experimental material and methods are presented, then numerical methods used to investigate such flows are briefly detailed. Finally, first comparisons are discussed.