2007
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m706002200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Constitutive, Transient Receptor Potential-like Ca2+ Influx Pathway in Presynaptic Nerve Endings Independent of Voltage-gated Ca2+ Channels and Na+/Ca2+ Exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the role of the background Na ϩ current in the control of resting membrane potential, some TRPC channels are constitutively active (24,36). Furthermore, in interstitial cells of Cajal, TRPC4 was suggested as a molecular candidate for the nonselective cation channel responsible for the pacemaker activity (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Consistent with the role of the background Na ϩ current in the control of resting membrane potential, some TRPC channels are constitutively active (24,36). Furthermore, in interstitial cells of Cajal, TRPC4 was suggested as a molecular candidate for the nonselective cation channel responsible for the pacemaker activity (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…La 3+ antagonizes several members of the canonical (C) family of TRP channels (TRPC3, 5, 6, and 7) (Albert et al, 2006), suggesting that PregS could act by potentiating these channels. TRPC channels have been found to be expressed in presynaptic nerve terminals (Goel et al, 2002, Nichols et al, 2007) and their activation has been implicated in neurotransmitter release modulation (Selvaraj et al). Interestingly, in the cerebellum, the expression of TRPC channels has been shown to be developmentally regulated; during the first 6 postnatal weeks, TRPC3 is abundantly expressed in comparison to TRPC4 and TRPC6 channels (Huang et al, 2007a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were plated at low density onto Cell‐Tak‐coated coverslips in 35‐mm dishes and then differentiated with dibutyryl‐cyclic AMP (1 m m ) (Sigma‐Aldrich) in DMEM with 1% FBS. After 2–3 days, a pcDNA3.1 construct containing the mouse α7 nAChR sequence (courtesy of Dr Jerry Stitzel, University of Colorado) was transfected into differentiated cells using the transfectant reagent FuGENE 6 (Roche Diagnostics), obtaining typically > 80% transfection efficiency as previously described (Nichols et al. , 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 1–2 days, the transfected, differentiated cells were loaded with fluorescent Ca 2+ indicator dye Fluo‐4/AM (Invitrogen) at 5 μ m in HEPES‐buffered saline (HBS) containing (in m m ) 142 NaCl, 2.4 KCl, 1.2 K 2 PO 4 , 1 MgCl 2 , 1 CaCl 2 , 5 d ‐glucose, pH 7.4, and saturated with O 2 at 37°C for 1–1.5 h in preparation for confocal imaging, as described (Nichols et al. , 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%