2013
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m113.472464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Constitutively Activating Mutation Alters the Dynamics and Energetics of a Key Conformational Change in a Ligand-free G Protein-coupled Receptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
57
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the effect of these mutations could be because of altering one or more steps on this activation pathway and not simply the breaking or making of one hydrogen bond. Interestingly, although not directly comparable, these energy differences are of a similar magnitude as the activation energy barrier for TM6 movement previously measured for the corresponding CAM mutation in rhodopsin (38). Another important caveat regarding our pharmacological studies-although they provide a good first approximation for assessing the receptor behavior with regards to agonist binding and G-protein activation, our modified allosteric ternary complex model cannot discern if more than one type of G protein-inactive state (such as R, R′, and R″) is present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the effect of these mutations could be because of altering one or more steps on this activation pathway and not simply the breaking or making of one hydrogen bond. Interestingly, although not directly comparable, these energy differences are of a similar magnitude as the activation energy barrier for TM6 movement previously measured for the corresponding CAM mutation in rhodopsin (38). Another important caveat regarding our pharmacological studies-although they provide a good first approximation for assessing the receptor behavior with regards to agonist binding and G-protein activation, our modified allosteric ternary complex model cannot discern if more than one type of G protein-inactive state (such as R, R′, and R″) is present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The mutant-θ is a nonreactive, minimal cysteine construct that enables fluorescence labeling for SDFL studies and has N-and C-terminal deletions to facilitate purification (10). Transfection was carried out transiently in COS-1 cells (10,38). Mutants used for SDFL studies were grown in the presence of 100 nM SR141716A.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, rhodopsin samples that contain active Ops* due to a constitutively activating mutation M257Y (CAM) (14,15) do not show full ATR release. Instead, ∼60% of the CAMs have ATR still bound under steady-state conditions (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Opsin experiments contained a stabilizing disulfide (N2C/D282C) to facilitate apoprotein purification (42). Proteins were expressed by transient transfection in COS-1 cells and either purified as opsin or regenerated with 11CR and labeled with the fluorophore monobromobimane as previously described (8,15). See SI Experimental Procedures for full details.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein Expression and Purification-The melanopsin mutants and jumping spider Rh1 were transiently expressed in COS-1 cells (typically 10 -20 plates), and the cells were harvested 48 h after transfection as described previously (34). The collected cells were incubated with 11-cis-retinal overnight, and membrane proteins were solubilized with 1.25% dodecyl maltoside (DDM; Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan), 20 mM HEPES, 140 mM NaCl, 0.25% cholesterol hemisuccinate (Sigma) 25 mM Tris, 10% glycerol, pH 7.0.…”
Section: Construction and Expression Of Mutants Of Melanopsins Andmentioning
confidence: 99%