2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2010.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A constrained finite strip method for open and closed cross-section members

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach requires a two-step analysis procedure that may lead to a pure mode solution and an all-mode solution. The pure mode calculation was performed using the constrained Finite Strip Method (cFSM) [6] in order to find the critical buckling half-wavelength L crD which is then applied in a simple finite strip method to determine the elastic buckling load P crD . In addition, it is worth noting that the cFSM pure distortional mode calculation uses a sharp-cornered model, while the conventional FSM analysis employs a model with rounded-corners.…”
Section: A Comparative Study Of Design Methods For Distortional Bucklingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach requires a two-step analysis procedure that may lead to a pure mode solution and an all-mode solution. The pure mode calculation was performed using the constrained Finite Strip Method (cFSM) [6] in order to find the critical buckling half-wavelength L crD which is then applied in a simple finite strip method to determine the elastic buckling load P crD . In addition, it is worth noting that the cFSM pure distortional mode calculation uses a sharp-cornered model, while the conventional FSM analysis employs a model with rounded-corners.…”
Section: A Comparative Study Of Design Methods For Distortional Bucklingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, a reliable method for computing the elastic critical moment or load of the three basic buckling modes plays a crucial role in assessing the load-carrying capacity of thin-walled structural members. Analytical formulas or numerical methods, such as the finite element method [4][5] or finite strip method [6][7], may be used to perform an accurate evaluation of the elastic critical moment (load). Moreover, analytical expressions for the evaluation of the elastic local and Euler buckling stresses are available in Timoshenko and Gere [8], whereas the distortional buckling prediction can usually be based on an analytical model of flange-lip combination with rotational and translational stiffness at the junction point [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Djafour et al [34] improved the constrained the finite strip method by simplifying the derivation of the constraint matrix in the case of combined global and distortional buckling modes. This led to a simple and systematic formulation which allowed the cFSM to compute pure buckling modes for members with open and closed thinwalled cross-sections.…”
Section: Fsm Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%