2015
DOI: 10.1142/s0218001416590023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Constrained Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Boundary Search and Archive

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a decomposition-based evolutionary algorithm with boundary search and archive for constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs), named CM2M. It decomposes a CMOP into a number of optimization subproblems and optimizes them simultaneously. Moreover, a novel constraint handling scheme based on the boundary search and archive is proposed. Each subproblem has one archive, including a subpopulation and a temporary register. Those individuals with better objective values and low… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then each subproblem is optimized by a coevolution strategy. Later, they proposed a constraint handing scheme based on boundary search and archive [85], in which a CMOP is decomposed into several subproblems, and each subproblem has its own archive. In addition, the boundary search strategy is constructed to improve the efficiency of the algorithm.…”
Section: Methods Of Transforming Cmops Into Other Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then each subproblem is optimized by a coevolution strategy. Later, they proposed a constraint handing scheme based on boundary search and archive [85], in which a CMOP is decomposed into several subproblems, and each subproblem has its own archive. In addition, the boundary search strategy is constructed to improve the efficiency of the algorithm.…”
Section: Methods Of Transforming Cmops Into Other Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each UCMOPs and IM-CMOPs has two objectives. Nine algorithms (M2M-IEpsilon, CCMO [19], CMOEA-MS [21], cDPEA [22], ToP [20], MOEA/D-CDP [14], MOEA/D-DW [30], CM2M2 [29], and CM2M [28]) were operated 30 times independently using the two test instances. The experimental parameters for each algorithm are as follows:…”
Section: Experimental Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, this method decomposes a population into a set of subpopulations, thereby maintaining the diversity of the population. In CMOPs, infeasible regions may make unconstrained PFs partially feasible, which may waste search effort on unpromising regions by using CM2M [28]. To effectively allocate search effort, CM2M2 [29] was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose eight test instances CTP1 ∼ CTP8 from the biobjective CTP-series (Deb, Pratap, & Meyarivan, 2001;Liu, Peng, Gu, & Wen, 2016), which are shown as follows:…”
Section: Test Instances and Performance Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we use the popular performance metric Hypervolume (HV) (Liu et al, 2016) as the performance index. HV metric can demonstrate both the convergence and diversity of Pareto non-dominated solutions in a sense (see in Figure 4).…”
Section: Test Instances and Performance Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%