2000
DOI: 10.4064/sm-142-1-65-69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A constructive proof of the composition rule for Taylor's functional calculus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear from the Stokes theorem that the definition of f (A)x does not depend on the choice of function ϕ and, by (6), it is independent of ∆.…”
Section: Proof (Ii)⇒(i)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear from the Stokes theorem that the definition of f (A)x does not depend on the choice of function ϕ and, by (6), it is independent of ∆.…”
Section: Proof (Ii)⇒(i)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear from the Stokes theorem that the definition of f (A)x does not depend on the choice of the function ϕ and, by (6), it is independent of ∆.…”
Section: The Function V : G → H(λ[s X]) Induces Naturally the Operatmentioning
confidence: 99%