A content analysis of dissemination and implementation science resource initiatives: what types of resources do they offer to advance the field?

Abstract

BackgroundThe recent growth in organized efforts to advance dissemination and implementation (D & I) science suggests a rapidly expanding community focused on the adoption and sustainment of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Although promising for the D & I of EBPs, the proliferation of initiatives is difficult for any one individual to navigate and summarize. Such proliferation may also result in redundant efforts or missed opportunities for participation and advancement. A review of existing D & I science resource initiatives and their unique merits would be a significant step for the field. The present study aimed to describe the global landscape of these organized efforts to advance D & I science.MethodsWe conducted a content analysis between October 2015 and March 2016 to examine resources and characteristics of D & I science resource initiatives using public, web-based information. Included resource initiatives must have engaged in multiple efforts to advance D & I science beyond conferences, offered D & I science resources, and provided content in English. The sampling method included an Internet search using D & I terms and inquiry among internationally representative D & I science experts. Using a coding scheme based on a priori and grounded approaches, two authors consensus coded website information including interactive and non-interactive resources and information regarding accessibility (membership, cost, competitive application, and location).ResultsThe vast majority (83%) of resource initiatives offered at least one of seven interactive resources (consultation/technical assistance, mentorship, workshops, workgroups, networking, conferences, and social media) and one of six non-interactive resources (resource library, news and updates from the field, archived talks or slides, links pages, grant writing resources, and funding opportunities). Non-interactive resources were most common, with some appearing frequently across resource initiatives (e.g., news and updates from the field).ConclusionFindings generated by this study offer insight into what types of D & I science resources exist and what new resources may have the greatest potential to make a unique and needed contribution to the field. Additional interactive resources may benefit the field, particularly mentorship opportunities and resources that can be accessed virtually. Moving forward, it may be useful to consider strategic attention to the core tenets of D & I science put forth by Glasgow and colleagues to most efficiently and effectively advance the field.

Aligning implementation and user-centered design strategies to enhance the impact of health services: results from a concept mapping study

“…It will also be important to develop supports for multidisciplinary implementation-design teams, drawing on the growing science of team science [46]. In the future, our research team plans to investigate UCDfocused team science resources (e.g., mentored development programs) and tools (e.g., shared online workspaces) to complement the limited, but growing, offerings of implementation training initiatives [47] and our UCD strategy glossary for implementation experts [22]. Our efforts will be informed by continued analysis of additional data collected from participants in this study.…”

The PM&R Journal Implements a Social Media Strategy to Disseminate Research and Track Alternative Metrics in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

“…Within implementation science are 2 distinct components that include dissemination research, which is the study of the distribution of evidence‐based medicine to clinical practice or public health audiences, and implementation research, which is the study of strategies used to adopt or integrate evidence‐based medicine into clinical or community settings [2]. An in‐depth discussion of the strategies [3] and resources available are beyond the scope of this report; notably, however, social media are a well‐described resource [4]. Although the field of implementation science is more than a decade old, it is still relatively young and evolving.…”

Unrecognized implementation science engagement among health researchers in the USA: a national survey

“…As efforts have emerged to advance IS, resources have been developed seeking to increase awareness of the importance of the field, as well as develop an understanding of the qualities that make an implementation study rigorous and "good" [1,2,6]. The scope of IS is broad, and can be challenging for uninitiated investigators to define, as it encompasses a range of methods both unique to IS as well as derived from other disciplines [1].…”