2022
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10030562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Content Analysis of Osteopaths’ Attitudes for a More Inclusive Clinical Practice towards Transgender People

Abstract: Objectives. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the attitudes, beliefs, and preferences of Italian osteopaths regarding the management of transgender patients through a content analysis of emergent data from semi-structured interviews. Methods. This study was a content analysis based on the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. Purposive sampling of 10 Italian osteopaths was applied. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, from March to April 2021, and subsequent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, this requirement is part of the professional osteopathic practice standards in the UK, where practitioners are expected to deliver ethical, competent, and safe osteopathic care, considering patients’ needs and values, including religion [ 102 ]. Moreover, a recently published qualitative study revealed that Italian osteopaths declared that embracing and applying osteopathic tenets could favor a more inclusive clinical practice [ 103 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, this requirement is part of the professional osteopathic practice standards in the UK, where practitioners are expected to deliver ethical, competent, and safe osteopathic care, considering patients’ needs and values, including religion [ 102 ]. Moreover, a recently published qualitative study revealed that Italian osteopaths declared that embracing and applying osteopathic tenets could favor a more inclusive clinical practice [ 103 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%