A content validity study of signs, symptoms and diseases/health problems expressed in LIBRAS

Aragão, Jamilly da Silva; França, Inacia Sátiro Xavier de; Coura, Alexsandro Silva; Sousa, Francisco Stélío de; Batista, Joana D'arc Lyra; Magalhães, Isabella Medeiros de Oliveira

doi:10.1590/0104-1169.0325.2644

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This investigation is in step with another study that aimed at validating the content of signs, symptoms and diseases/health care grievances expressed in Libras by deaf people, wherein 33 expressions were assessed and 28 of them obtained satisfactory CVI, thus being deemed representative and valid. (25) It must be emphasized that content validity is of utmost importance on tool development and adaptation processes. The reports of another study are corroborated as it implicates that the methodology in use may subsidize the development of technology that is attractive and comprehensive to the deaf public, what may facilitate the production of other technologies linked to education, focused on this theme or on any other that involves health care and attention.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validação de tecnologia em libras para educação em saúde de surdos

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo Objetivo: Construir e validar um vídeo educativo em Libras para educação em saúde de surdos acerca da Aids e suas formas de transmissão. Métodos: Estudo de desenvolvimento metodológico, com referencial psicométrico, desenvolvido em uma escola de audiocomunicação. Participaram cinco juízes e 18 pessoas surdas. Na coleta dos dados utilizou-se escala Likert e, na análise, o Alfa de Cronbach e o Índice de Validade de Conteúdo (IVC). Resultados: O vídeo educativo “Comunicação em Libras: aprendendo sobre a Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida (Aids), tem duração de 20 minutos. O roteiro do vídeo foi dividido em três blocos e respectivos itens: Bloco A - Aids, formas de transmissão, sinais e sintomas, diagnóstico, tratamento, prevenção; Bloco B - Tipos de preservativos. Bloco C - Aids, um problema de saúde pública. Obteve-se entre os juízes IVC médio de 0,96 para os itens e de 0,90 para os critérios psicométricos de avaliação geral. Entre os surdos obteve-se IVC médio de 0,87. O Alpha de Cronbach Total para os juízes foi 0,989 e, para os surdos 0,634. Conclusão: O vídeo educativo apresenta evidências de validade e representatividade para ser utilizado na assistência e nos processos de educação em saúde do público-alvo.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validação de tecnologia em libras para educação em saúde de surdos

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We calculated the CVI for each item by counting the number of experts who rated each item with three or four, and dividing that number by the total number of experts, which resulted in the proportion who considered the item as valid content (18). Items marked as "Agree" or "Totally agree" were considered representative, obtaining an index score equal to 1.00, and items with all evaluations equal to 1.00 had 100% agreement (19).…”

Section: Data Treatment and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Prioritization criteria in policies and management of human resources for health: a proposal for a validated methodology

Oliveira,

Mion,

Batista

et al. 2024

Revista Panamericana De Salud Pública

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To create and validate criteria for prioritizing problems related to policies and management of the health workforce. Methods. This methodological study was divided into three stages. First, the criteria were elaborated by means of a systematized literature review. Second, the criteria were evaluated online by a committee of judges comprised of eight specialists. In the third stage, an evaluation was carried out by the target audience in a hybrid workshop. The participants evaluated the material using the Suitability Assessment of Materials instrument, adapted for the research. Results. Three prioritization criteria (relevance, window of opportunity and acceptability) and a scoring scale were developed based on the literature review. In the evaluation by the committee of judges, the approval percentage of the criteria and prioritization method was 84%. Modifications were made based on suggestions in relation to the material presented to the specialists. In the pre-test stage, the approval percentage varied by item, with six of them reaching a maximum approval of 100% (corresponding to approximately 46% of the items), four reaching 92% and three achieving 83% each, indicating positive results. Conclusions. The developed criteria were considered valid for use in the context of policies and management in the area of human resources for health.

show abstract

“…and its items. Items marked with "Agree" or "Strongly Agree" are considered representative, obtaining an index score of 1.00 and the item that has all assessments equal to 1.00 will have 100% agreement (26) .…”

Section: Instruments Used To Collect Informationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cultural adaptation and validation of the Strategies to end seclusion restraint module of the QualityRights ToolKit*

Zanardo

Ventura

2022

Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective to adapt to the Brazilian culture and validate the module “Strategies to end seclusion restraint” of the QualityRights toolkit of the World Health Organization on mental disorders to train health professionals in Brazil. Method it is a methodological study divided into three stages. The modules were translated from the original language (English) to the target language (Brazilian Portuguese) in the first stage. In the second, the translation was assessed by a committee of judges with seven experts. In the third stage, the assessment was conducted by mental health professionals (nurses, psychologists, and lawyers), in which seven mental health professionals participated. They assessed the material using the Suitability Assessment of Materials instrument. Results in the assessment conducted by the experts (n=7), 8 items assessed obtained 100% approval and the other 6 items obtained lower approvals, with a total approval of 92%. Regarding the assessment by health professionals (n=7), 2 items had a maximum approval of 100% and the other had the approval of 86% each, with a total approval of 88%. Conclusion based on the results, it is considered that this module is adapted to the Brazilian culture and can be used to train Brazilian health professionals.

show abstract

A content validity study of signs, symptoms and diseases/health problems expressed in LIBRAS

Cited by 10 publications

References 17 publications

Validação de tecnologia em libras para educação em saúde de surdos

Validação de tecnologia em libras para educação em saúde de surdos

Prioritization criteria in policies and management of human resources for health: a proposal for a validated methodology

Cultural adaptation and validation of the Strategies to end seclusion restraint module of the QualityRights ToolKit*

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About