2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2019.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Context-aware Radio Access Technology selection mechanism in 5G mobile network for smart city applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the complexity reduces to cubic in the absence of multihoming and reduces to linear when only two access devices are considered. Regarding convergence, the algorithm converges to Nash Equilibrium with the average Paretoefficiency gap bound defined by (24) and (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the complexity reduces to cubic in the absence of multihoming and reduces to linear when only two access devices are considered. Regarding convergence, the algorithm converges to Nash Equilibrium with the average Paretoefficiency gap bound defined by (24) and (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooperation between user equipment and network devices is proposed, along with the use of machine-learning for network optimization. An approach using context-aware RAT selection is proposed in [24]. The presented experimental results indicate that context-aware RAT selection outperforms conventionally used RAT selection techniques, including signal strength, link throughput, and network delay.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The paper presents a proof-of-concept for 6G networks, arguing that better data rates could be achieved by cooperatively involving UEs and network devices to make machine learning-based network optimization decisions compared to network-centric approaches. In a contextaware radio access technology selection technique, client and network contexts are considered for choosing a RAT [18]. Results show such a context-aware approach outperforms conventional RAT selection approaches like received signal strength, number of handovers, delay, and throughput, etc.…”
Section: Controller and Clientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Таble 4. TOPSIS Method in Technology Selection Authors (year) Type of Technology [Habbal et al, 2019] radio access technologies [Gladysz et al, 2017;Wan et al, 2016] radio frequency identification (RFID) [Zhang et al, 2019] energy storage technology [Restrepo-Garcés et al, 2017;Hirushie et al, 2017] renewable energy sources [Karatas et al, 2018] energy technology [Streimikiene, 2013a,b;Streimikiene et al, 2013;Streimikiene, Balezentiene, 2012] electric vehicles [Zheng et al, 2012] green buildings [Peng et al, 2019] restoration technology in engine remanufacturing practice [Aloini et al, 2018] advanced underwater system [Büyüközkan, Güler, 2017] smart glass (SG) [Ansari et al, 2016;Puthanpura et al, 2015] automotive technology [Elahi et al, 2011] ABS sensor technology [Govind et al, 2018] treatment and disposal technology [Ren, 2018] ballast water treatment [Vivekh et al, 2017] desalination technology [Kalbar et al, 2012;Fu et al, 2012] wastewater treatment technology [Jiří, 2018;Mobinizadeh et al, 2016;Gajdoš et al, 2015;Lu et al, 2016] health technology [Lee, James Chou, 2016] emerging three-dimensional integrated circuit (3DIC) [Tavana et al, 2013] advanced-technology projects at NASA [Oztaysi, 2014] information technology [Towhidi et al, 2009] iron-making technology [Parkan, Wu, 1999] robots to perform repetitious, difficult, and hazardous tasks with precision…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%