2008
DOI: 10.1109/tem.2008.2005547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Contextual Approach to Improving Software Metrics Practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Employee resistance often obstructs CMMI adoption progress, especially when its adoption involves various departments from the entire company and brings a shock to the workflow. When promoting comprehensive change such as CMMI adoption, the differences among departments should thus be carefully handled (Frederiksen & Mathiassen, 2008). For the authorization of labor division, a balance should also be achieved between the effects of change and communication efficiency; information about the change can then be effectively conveyed to front-line employees.…”
Section: Implications For Practitionersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employee resistance often obstructs CMMI adoption progress, especially when its adoption involves various departments from the entire company and brings a shock to the workflow. When promoting comprehensive change such as CMMI adoption, the differences among departments should thus be carefully handled (Frederiksen & Mathiassen, 2008). For the authorization of labor division, a balance should also be achieved between the effects of change and communication efficiency; information about the change can then be effectively conveyed to front-line employees.…”
Section: Implications For Practitionersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is used to assist decision-making by providing a tool that allows the current behavior of a system to be analyzed and understood. It is also able to help predict the performance of that system under a Through the literature review a lot of recommendations for process performance efficiency assessment were encountered [19,29,30], which can be performed based on the operational and structural efficiency indicators. The first indicators are connected with time, costs, and/or quality [31,32], whereas structural efficiency indicators are connected with business process structural complexity [33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ob pregledovanju relevantne literature je mogoče najti različne predloge za ocenjevanje učinkovitosti izvajanja poslovnih procesov. Predlogi se nanašajo na ocenjevanje s pomočjo kazalnikov operativne učinkovitosti (Dibrell idr., 2008;Frederiksen in Mathiassen, 2008;Sharma, 2009) in kazalnikov strukturne učinkovitosti (Aguilar idr., 2006;Cardoso, 2006;Mendling, 2008). Kazalniki operativne učinkovitosti vključujejo predvsem vidik porabe časa in vidik nastalih stroškov (Valiris in Glykas, 2004;Cardoso idr., 2006a), medtem, ko so kazalniki strukturne učinkovitosti povezani z ocenjevanjem strukturne kompleksnosti poslovnih procesov (Cardoso, 2006;Mendling, 2008;Gartner, 2020).…”
Section: Teoretični Model Ocenjevanja Učinkov Organizacijskih Spremembunclassified