2008
DOI: 10.1080/17405620600866800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A continuous performance task in preschool children: Relations between attention and performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 60 children who attempted the SAM, 85% percent completed all six blocks. The fact that only 15% of the sample was unable to complete all of the blocks is not only consistent with previous findings when using a CPT model with preschoolers (Danis et al, 2008) but also speaks to the largely age-appropriate and developmentally sensitive nature of the SAM. This completion rate is especially promising given that, by nature of the SAM's placement over 2 hours into a larger assessment battery, this was a stringent test of feasibility; earlier placement in the battery would likely produce higher completion rates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the 60 children who attempted the SAM, 85% percent completed all six blocks. The fact that only 15% of the sample was unable to complete all of the blocks is not only consistent with previous findings when using a CPT model with preschoolers (Danis et al, 2008) but also speaks to the largely age-appropriate and developmentally sensitive nature of the SAM. This completion rate is especially promising given that, by nature of the SAM's placement over 2 hours into a larger assessment battery, this was a stringent test of feasibility; earlier placement in the battery would likely produce higher completion rates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…When used in a sample of preschool-age children, this revised version of the CPT was sensitive and able to differentiate between children with and without attentional problems (Byrne, Bawden, DeWolfe, & Beattie, 1998). While currently a well-established measure for assessing children's sustained attention, the CPT is used less often in preschool-aged samples relative to elementary school-aged samples (Danis, Pecheux, Lefevre, Bourdais, & Serres-Ruel, 2008) and its history as a task for adults presents a potential weakness, discussed above. Like the CPT, the SAM is computerized task that contains multiple trials in which a participant must focus and identify a specific target using a touch-screen monitor and maintain this focus over time (approximately 15 minutes in the SAM across multiple 3-minute blocks).…”
Section: Existing Measures Of Attention In Preschoolersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During early childhood, cognitive, linguistic, and socio-moral development are abruptly brought up. First, in terms of cognitive development, children concentrate their attention by themselves and their ability to control attention voluntarily as their age increases to 2.5 years, 3.5 years, and 4.5 years [31,32]. As short-term memory capacity increases during these years, children can catch the changes of objects up to two or three items for 3-or 4-year-olds, and up to three or four items for 5-or 7-year-olds [29].…”
Section: The Effect Of Age On Message Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustained and selective attention, other indicators of attentional control, can be assessed in young children using visual tasks, such as searching for a target item amid an array of other items (Whedon, Perry, Calkins, & Bell, 2016). Attention has been associated with the selection of tasks, preparation, and consistency in activities children chose for pleasure (Danis, Pecheux, Lefevre, Bourdais, & Serres-Ruel, 2008). According to Garon, Bryson, and Smith (2008), children's short-term memory and ability to focus attention develop concurrently during early childhood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%