Creep in Structures 1981
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81598-0_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Continuum Theory of Creep and Creep Damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
164
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 290 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
164
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the grid size, a few metres). When considering an anisotropic approach, damage must be represented as a second-order tensor (Murakami and Ohno, 1981;Pralong and Funk, 2005). However, following Pralong and Funk (2005), here we consider isotropic damage as a first approximation.…”
Section: Continuum Damage Mechanics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the grid size, a few metres). When considering an anisotropic approach, damage must be represented as a second-order tensor (Murakami and Ohno, 1981;Pralong and Funk, 2005). However, following Pralong and Funk (2005), here we consider isotropic damage as a first approximation.…”
Section: Continuum Damage Mechanics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial scale of interest in mechanical modeling is typically the macroscale response of a material or structure, which may be orders of magnitude larger than the fractures that exist at the microscale. Even though fractures are by nature local phenomena, and their spatial extent may be small relative to the macroscale response of interest, their effect on deformation or strain can be measured at the macroscale (Murakami and Ohno, 1981). Ignoring these features simply because they cannot be resolved by a model is not prudent.…”
Section: Damage Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For scalar (isotropic) damage, damage is interpreted as representing the weakest cross section of the element since this section governs the ultimate load bearing capacity of the element as a whole. For fully viscous (long timescale) deformation, this type of simple area reduction due to fractures likely dominates the material response over the shape or orientation of the cracks (Murakami and Ohno, 1981), which favors a scalar representation of damage. However, damage can also be represented as a tensor to account for varying damage on different orthogonal planes, which can account for any anisotropy induced by the orientation of fractures in a material.…”
Section: Linear Mapping Between Physical and Effective Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting effective stress is expressed in terms of the damage tensor [7]. For definitions of a second order damage tensor see also [3,8,9,10,11].…”
Section: Phenomenological Definitions Of Damage Parameters Numerous mentioning
confidence: 99%