2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-45382-3_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Contrario Mosaic Analysis for Image Forensics

Quentin Bammey

Abstract: With the advent of recent technologies, image editing has become accessible even without expertise. However, this ease of manipulation has given rise to malicious manipulation of images, resulting in the creation and dissemination of visually-realistic fake images to spread disinformation online, wrongfully incriminate someone, or commit fraud. The detection of such forgeries is paramount in exposing those deceitful acts. One promising approach involves unveiling the underlying mosaic of an image, which indica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach to detection has found successful application across a broad spectrum of detection tasks, as seen in numerous studies [19]- [37] that showcase the theory's effective utilization in various facets of image processing. This includes but is not limited to image forensics, where the a contrario method has proven to be of significant value [6]- [8], [38]- [44]. In the case of image forensics, this approach bridges a critical gap left by many existing forgery detection methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach to detection has found successful application across a broad spectrum of detection tasks, as seen in numerous studies [19]- [37] that showcase the theory's effective utilization in various facets of image processing. This includes but is not limited to image forensics, where the a contrario method has proven to be of significant value [6]- [8], [38]- [44]. In the case of image forensics, this approach bridges a critical gap left by many existing forgery detection methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%