2016
DOI: 10.1515/cjal-2016-0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A contrastive pragmatic study of politeness strategies in disagreement between native speakers of English and Chinese EFL learners

Abstract: This paper attempts to make a contrastive cross-cultural study of a special speech act— “disagreement.” Participants are 35 American undergraduates and 42 Chinese undergraduates respectively with the data eliciting technique—DCT (discourse completion test). Findings show that Chinese undergraduates tend to use different politeness strategies according to different social distance and social power while American undergraduates prefer to use positive politeness strategy most followed by negative politeness strat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Yan (2016) has partially replicated Xuehua's (2006) study with DCT by contrasting the disagreement of 35 Americans and 42 Chinese English students in different scenarios. The second scenario verifies the situation that inter-ests us: "In class when your teacher is explaining how to solve a problem, you find the teacher's solution is not correct and you don't agree with her.…”
Section: Main Strategies Of Disagreement Subcategoriesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Yan (2016) has partially replicated Xuehua's (2006) study with DCT by contrasting the disagreement of 35 Americans and 42 Chinese English students in different scenarios. The second scenario verifies the situation that inter-ests us: "In class when your teacher is explaining how to solve a problem, you find the teacher's solution is not correct and you don't agree with her.…”
Section: Main Strategies Of Disagreement Subcategoriesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Since the first studies on intercultural courtesy the analysis of dissent was carried out taking the purpose of each interaction into consideration (Brown andLevinson ([1978] 1987); Kerbrat-Orecchioni, 1997). To achieve this, researchers used some of the patterns that emerged from speech acts and others that resulted from more recent studies (Chen, M. 2006;Xuehua, 2006;Brenes-Peña, 2011;Yan, 2016). They did so with the intention of not reducing the analysis to a single sentence, but rather to observe certain co-occurrences.…”
Section: Introduction: Disagreement In Academic Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The text of an international agreement is developed mainly in negotiations, whereby mutual concessions and compromises (Yan, 2016), the project is subject to change until it is acceptable to all participants. Thus, the contract is the result of the joint activities of the parties.…”
Section: Regardless Of the Quantitative And Structural Criteria The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This literary work is derived from life. The changeable and refined language greatly enhances its literary quality, which reflects Shakespeare's profound language skills and profound Creative connotation [18][19][20].…”
Section: Linguistic Features Of British and American Literary Work Fr...mentioning
confidence: 99%