2016
DOI: 10.1257/pol.20140211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Contribution to the Empirics of Reservation Wages

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
40
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(55 reference statements)
8
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following our approach, Lalive, Landais, and Zweimüller (2015) also find that the path of reemployment wages does not respond to increases in UI durations in Austria. In contrast, Krueger and Mueller (2014) find that jobs with wages above the self-reported reservation wage are more likely to be accepted, although a substantial fraction of jobs paying below the reservation wage are accepted as well. However, they also find that reservation wages neither change significantly throughout the nonemployment spell within individuals, nor do they respond to UI exhaustion.…”
Section: The Shift Of Reemployment Hazards and Wagesmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following our approach, Lalive, Landais, and Zweimüller (2015) also find that the path of reemployment wages does not respond to increases in UI durations in Austria. In contrast, Krueger and Mueller (2014) find that jobs with wages above the self-reported reservation wage are more likely to be accepted, although a substantial fraction of jobs paying below the reservation wage are accepted as well. However, they also find that reservation wages neither change significantly throughout the nonemployment spell within individuals, nor do they respond to UI exhaustion.…”
Section: The Shift Of Reemployment Hazards and Wagesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This is in a similar spirit as Hornstein, Krusell, and Violante (2011), who infer about reservation wages using data on worker flows, and who find, consistent with our results, that in a broad range of search models unemployed workers' must place a low value on their outside option. 5 The best evidence on reported reservation wages comes from Krueger and Mueller (2014), who find that while reservation wages appear to influence employment decisions among UI recipients in New Jersey, they are neither affected by unemployment duration nor by UI duration. Hence, as in our setting, changes in reservation wages are unlikely to be responsible for reductions in reemployment wages over the unemployment spell.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feldstein and Poterba (1984),Holzer (1986), andKrueger and Mueller (2016) use a similar survey approach to elicit the reservation wages of unemployed workers.• Starting at the reference salary, imagine that earnings for Option A were to decline (increase).What earnings level for Option A would be just low (high) enough that you would switch to Option B (Option A)?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chetty (2008) finds that the liquidity effect accounts for 60% of the impact of UI. Krueger and Mueller (2016) find that severance payments and savings tend to be positively associated with the workers' reservation wages. The mechanism is also related to several other papers that shed light on job search problems (Bloemen and Stancanelli, 2001;Algan et al, 2003;Lentz and Tranas, 2005;Silvio, 2006;Browning, Crossley and Smith, 2007;Kaplan, 2012;Herkenhoff, 2015;Herkenhoff and Ohanian, 2015;Herkenhoff, Phillips and Cohen-Cole, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%