Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-28084-7_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Contribution to the History of Seriation in Archaeology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be seen as a simplification of a so-called abundance matrix which codes in each cell the (relative) frequency or quantity of an artifact type at a site. See Ihm (2005) for a comparison of incidence and abundance matrices in archeology.…”
Section: Binary Data Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be seen as a simplification of a so-called abundance matrix which codes in each cell the (relative) frequency or quantity of an artifact type at a site. See Ihm (2005) for a comparison of incidence and abundance matrices in archeology.…”
Section: Binary Data Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Robinson (1951), Kendall (1971) and others proposed measures of agreement between rows to quantify optimality of the resulting table. A comprehensive description of the development of seriation in archeology is presented by Ihm (2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpretation of the work done by Petrie will remain largely subjective, as he did not explicitly describe all the details in the papers and according to ref 42,. his notes and records were destroyed.…”
Section: An Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petrie's work influenced several prominent American anthropologists and archaeologists like George Andrew Reisner, Alfred Vincent Kidder, Alfred Louis Kroeber, Nels Nelson, Leslie Spier, James A. Ford (several good reviews and a discussion of such a methodological lineage include refs14,39,42,43), who applied, popularized, and further developed the methodology to better suit the practical needs for relative dating.…”
Section: An Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building chronologies involves distinguishing between relative (providing only a chronological sequence) and absolute dating methods (that yield calendric indicators) (O'Brien & Lyman, 2002). Within relative dating, matrix seriation is a long-established method-it was first formulated by Petrie (1899)-and has allowed for the construction of reference chronologies (Ihm, 2005). For a set X of n archaeological assemblages, the seriation problem comes down to discovering in X an order inferred as chronological.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%