2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi10030156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Contributor-Focused Intrinsic Quality Assessment of OpenStreetMap in Mozambique Using Unsupervised Machine Learning

Abstract: Anyone can contribute geographic information to OpenStreetMap (OSM), regardless of their level of experience or skills, which has raised concerns about quality. When reference data is not available to assess the quality of OSM data, intrinsic methods that assess the data and its metadata can be used. In this study, we applied unsupervised machine learning for analysing OSM history data to get a better understanding of who contributed when and how in Mozambique. Even though no absolute statements can be made ab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Articles from the peak in 2014 generally focus on laying the frameworks for assessing volunteered geographic information (VGI) quality [18,19], along with the development of methods for assessment [20][21][22][23]. In recent years, despite the lower number of articles, the field developed in several new directions, such as in more sophisticated statistical machine learning methods for quality assessment [24,25] and POI matching [26,27]. Recent studies also explore novel data sources beyond OSM, such as LBSNs and review websites [27,28], and broader applications of POI data [10,29,30].…”
Section: Review Of Approaches For Validating Poi Data Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Articles from the peak in 2014 generally focus on laying the frameworks for assessing volunteered geographic information (VGI) quality [18,19], along with the development of methods for assessment [20][21][22][23]. In recent years, despite the lower number of articles, the field developed in several new directions, such as in more sophisticated statistical machine learning methods for quality assessment [24,25] and POI matching [26,27]. Recent studies also explore novel data sources beyond OSM, such as LBSNs and review websites [27,28], and broader applications of POI data [10,29,30].…”
Section: Review Of Approaches For Validating Poi Data Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning methods can estimate positional accuracy based on the spatial, temporal and user characteristics of contributions [42]. Some external data will first be required to train the estimation model, although unsupervised learning methods can be used to glean insights into the characteristics of contributors [25].…”
Section: Positional Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among them Du et al (2012), Abdolmajidi et al (2014), Fan et al (2016) and Brovelli et al (2017) developed and tested methodologies to evaluate the quality of OSM data by comparing it against their authoritative counterparts, using the road network as a use case applied at the local level (city or town) in different places around Europe (UK, Sweden, Germany and Italy, respectively). Instead of comparing OSM with authoritative datasets, other studies such as Barron et al (2014), Minghini and Frassinelli (2019) and Madubedube et al (2021) assessed OSM quality through intrinsic approaches, i.e. by only looking at the history of the OSM data itself (e.g.…”
Section: Background On Integration Between Authoritative and Openstreetmap Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the supervised classification, the algorithm is first trained using ground data and then applied to classify the image pixels. Unsupervised algorithms only use the information that is contained in the image to classify pixels without requiring any training data [3,4]. As the algorithm does not require training samples, it is easy to perform with minimum human intervention and cost [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%