2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40722-021-00198-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A control-orientated analytical model for a cyclorotor wave energy device with N hydrofoils

Abstract: We present a new analytical model from which a model-based controller can be derived for a cyclorotor-based wave energy converter (WEC). Few cyclorotor-based WEC concepts and models have previously been studied and only one control strategy for the entire wave cancellation has been tested. Our model is derived for a horizontal cyclorotor with N hydrofoils and is suitable for the application of various control algorithms and the calculation of various performance metrics. The mechanical model is based on Newton… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This note provides, within the fidelity of the model [9] employed, conclusive evidence that a time-varying rotational rate profile for a cyclorotor optimally captures wave power and that it is important to focus on the converted (shaft) energy metric, rather than using wave cancellation as a surrogate measure. However, the results presented are calculated by the model in [9], which has some approximations in relation to the potential (theory) wave model employed, using a representation of the foil as the point source and use of the approximate lift and drag coefficients from [12]. These approximations may affect the relative balance between shaft power and wave cancellation, since the model does not consider complex hydrodynamic effects such as added mass, dynamic drag losses and generation of the vortices caused by the rapid changes in rotational speed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This note provides, within the fidelity of the model [9] employed, conclusive evidence that a time-varying rotational rate profile for a cyclorotor optimally captures wave power and that it is important to focus on the converted (shaft) energy metric, rather than using wave cancellation as a surrogate measure. However, the results presented are calculated by the model in [9], which has some approximations in relation to the potential (theory) wave model employed, using a representation of the foil as the point source and use of the approximate lift and drag coefficients from [12]. These approximations may affect the relative balance between shaft power and wave cancellation, since the model does not consider complex hydrodynamic effects such as added mass, dynamic drag losses and generation of the vortices caused by the rapid changes in rotational speed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In order to compute the optimal rotational rate profile, we use the validated model [9]- [11] of a cyclorotor, with the following specifications, proposed in [5]: two hydrofoils NACA0015 [12] with chord length C = 5 m, operational radius R = 6 m, and a distance y 0 = −12 m between the still water level (SWL) and rotor centre (see Fig. 1).…”
Section: Key Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations