A Controlled Evaluation of a High School Biomedical Pipeline Program: Design and Methods

Abstract

Given limited funding for school-based science education, non-school-based programs have been developed at colleges and universities to increase the number of students entering science- and health-related careers and address critical workforce needs. However, few evaluations of such programs have been conducted. We report the design and methods of a controlled trial to evaluate the Stanford Medical Youth Science Program’s Summer Residential Program (SRP), a 25-year-old university-based biomedical pipeline program. This 5-year matched cohort study uses an annual survey to assess educational and career outcomes among four cohorts of students who participate in the SRP and a matched comparison group of applicants who were not chosen to participate in the SRP. Matching on sociodemographic and academic background allows control for potential confounding. This design enables the testing of whether the SRP has an independent effect on educational- and career-related outcomes above and beyond the effects of other factors such as gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic background, and pre-intervention academic preparation. The results will help determine which curriculum components contribute most to successful outcomes and which students benefit most. After 4 years of follow-up, the results demonstrate high response rates from SRP participants and the comparison group with completion rates near 90%, similar response rates by gender and ethnicity, and little attrition with each additional year of follow-up. This design and methods can potentially be replicated to evaluate and improve other biomedical pipeline programs, which are increasingly important for equipping more students for science- and health-related careers.

Growing the Pipeline of Diverse HIV Investigators: The Impact of Mentored Research Experiences to Engage Underrepresented Minority Students

“…Yet, many hold that we should develop a wide range of opportunities for K-12 students and carefully track career outcomes (45,46). Future plans for SHARP involve expanding the program to include high school students given the model’s early success in catalyzing interest in HIV research-focused career paths.…”

Engaging Underrepresented Adolescents in Authentic Scientific Settings: Scientist Role Models and Improving Psychosocial Outcomes

“…Therefore, there is a critical need for more effective comprehensive programs that apply a diversity of strategies to target the multiple needs and assets of underrepresented minority students (Richardson et al, 2017). Well-designed comprehensive programs in science education outside of formal school science curriculums that are implemented in authentic scientific settings have been found effective in addressing the multiple factors influencing students' pursuit of scientific careers (Ashley et al, 2017;Crump et al, 2015;Winkleby and Ned, 2010;Winkleby et al, 2014). A comprehensive program can be defined as including at least two and preferably more of the follow-ing components: a) lectures on particular science topics, b) hands-on science related activities, c) student participation in developing, conducting, or evaluating a research study, d) presentation of research results, and e) mentoring from scientists (Ashley et al, 2017).…”

Demonstrating the Efficacy of the Health Sciences and Technology Academy: Using Archival Standardized Test Scores to Analyze an OST College-Preparatory Program for Underserved Youth

“…More recently, the role of stereotype threat (Spencer et al, 1999;Steele et al, 2002), also referred to as collective threat (Cohen and Garcia, 2005), has been linked to lower academic performance in underrepresented groups. Studies (Willingham and Cole, 1997;Ryan and Ryan, 2005;Fernandes et al, 2016) have demonstrated that African American students, especially African American males, tend to score lower on standardized math tests than White and Asian students (U.S. Department of Education, 2001;Mc-Farland et al, 2017). Research has also found that African Americans significantly underperform on standardized tests, particularly in the areas of math and science (College Board, 2015;Ferreira, 2002;Finkel, 2010;Hedges and Nowell, 1999).…”