“…HF xenotransplantation is currently the only preclinical assay that permits complete human HF cycling and supports long-lasting human anagen studies in vivo and is therefore a uniquely instructive and indispensable human hair research tool. However, despite several early reports ( De Brouwer et al ., 1997 ; Gilhar et al ., 1988 ; Gilhar et al ., 1998 ; Hashimoto et al ., 2000 , 2001 ; Jahoda et al ., 1996 ; Krajcik et al ., 2003 ; Lyle et al ., 1999 ; Tang et al ., 2002 ; Van Neste et al ., 1989 ), and more recent uses for the experimental induction of alopecia areata ( Gilhar et al ., 2013 ), post-grafting human scalp hair cycle dynamics remain poorly characterized, hindering broader adaptation of this model. Furthermore, as xenografting is inevitably associated with surgery-, wound healing-, reinnervation-, and reperfusion-related phenomena that are absent during normal scalp HF cycling in vivo (see below), a detailed morphological comparison between xenografted and freshly biopsied human scalp HFs is needed.…”