Background
What have the Royal Society of Health -350 years old this year -the Journal of Family Planning and ReproductiveHealth Care and the Department of Health's (DH) new campaign, 'Sex. Worth Talking About', got in common? The Royal Society was set up to assist and promote the accumulation of knowledge, promote clarity of expression, and develop scientific publishing and peer review. The DH's campaign is about promoting more open and honest discussion about sex, relationships and contraception among young people. The Journal aims to improve reproductive health and sexual health nationally and internationally through published peer-reviewed research and information. What they have in common is the desire to inform through communication and this involves language. To communicate effectively we need to use understandable words and terms that enable and inform. In 2004, I wrote about the need to improve how we communicate and talk about sexual health 1 because I believed then, and still believe today, that we do this badly and we have a responsibility to do it better.
LanguageThere is a wealth of information about sex and sexual health, but as embarrassment, anxiety, misinformation and myth continue to surround anything to do with sex, why do we continue to use language that is archaic, unclear and confusing? More importantly, why is there seemingly no wish to understand that as sexual health issues change and evolve, how we talk about it must change too? I am not alone in this view. Grimes and Stuart 2 argue for improved terminology when talking about abortion, illustrating that the subject is riddled with jabberwocky and terminology that is contradictory, obsolete, ambiguous and misleading and, that for decades, such terminology has hindered, not helped, the ongoing debate about abortion. Six years earlier, Weitz et al. 3 raised the need to find clear, accurate and accessible language relating to abortion and address the challenge of redefining our language to serve women better when medical abortion was introduced. Berer 4 went further in stating the need to have some consensus about terminology in recognition of international understanding and use.John Humphrys, writing in Beyond Words, 5 is passionate about language and is scathing of its poor use and ambiguity; indeed he notes how the English language "has been mangled and manipulated by those who should know better". Humphrys goes on to say that "language is more than a tool for expressing ourselves. It acts as a mirror to our world, reflecting back to us the way we live". Place a mirror on sexual health -what would we see? Humphrys addresses sex -he notes that words and phrases that have long settled into our way of speaking still bring some people out in a rash of indignation and sex "as ever -is a