1981
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-198108000-00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Controlled Trial of Plasmapheresis in the Treatment of Renal Allograft Rejection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although performed in a very special and standardized immunologic context, which would appear to be a logical strategy for PE (i. e., presence of anti-donor Ab at the onset of the rejection episode), these observations, like other recent randomized [13] or nonrandomized studies [12], do not suggest a beneficial influence of PE in kidney rejection episodes, in contrast to the results of previous nonrandomized reports [14,15]. In addition, these data do not suggest that anti-donor Ab's play a major and direct role in graft destruction, but rather that they might only be testimony to a strong accompanying host immune response, as is also suggested by the appearance o f 'large' anti-panel antibodies and of autolymphocytotoxins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Although performed in a very special and standardized immunologic context, which would appear to be a logical strategy for PE (i. e., presence of anti-donor Ab at the onset of the rejection episode), these observations, like other recent randomized [13] or nonrandomized studies [12], do not suggest a beneficial influence of PE in kidney rejection episodes, in contrast to the results of previous nonrandomized reports [14,15]. In addition, these data do not suggest that anti-donor Ab's play a major and direct role in graft destruction, but rather that they might only be testimony to a strong accompanying host immune response, as is also suggested by the appearance o f 'large' anti-panel antibodies and of autolymphocytotoxins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…However, a similar controlled study, recently reported by Kirubakaran and associates [6] failed to show any improvement in graft survival in the 12 patients receiving plasmapheresis along with standard immunosuppressive therapy. The major difference in apheresis protocols between the two investigators related to the amount of plasma volume removed.…”
Section: Cardella Et A1mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Despite this recommendation, the evidence base for plasmapheresis is not consistently supportive (3,10,39,48). Plasmapheresis does not affect antibody synthesis and DSA levels rebound rapidly after plasmapheresis (2).…”
Section: Antibody Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%