1970
DOI: 10.1021/j100699a054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A convenient method for obtaining free energies of activation by the coalescence temperature of an unequal doublet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
135
0
5

Year Published

1990
1990
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 351 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
9
135
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…An analytical method, however, has been developed for estimating the activation free energies for a 2:1 site exchange. 46 This method is outlined in the Experimental Section, and the values obtained for the activation energies given in Table 7 are reasonable as they are similar to those in Table 6. c As T c and ∆ν are determined by an extrapolation of the temperature dependence of the CMe 3 protons in C 7 D 8 as described in the Experimental Section.…”
Section: (D) Quantitative Evaluation Of the N-cme 3 Rotation Barriersupporting
confidence: 54%
“…An analytical method, however, has been developed for estimating the activation free energies for a 2:1 site exchange. 46 This method is outlined in the Experimental Section, and the values obtained for the activation energies given in Table 7 are reasonable as they are similar to those in Table 6. c As T c and ∆ν are determined by an extrapolation of the temperature dependence of the CMe 3 protons in C 7 D 8 as described in the Experimental Section.…”
Section: (D) Quantitative Evaluation Of the N-cme 3 Rotation Barriersupporting
confidence: 54%
“…8 Application of this equation to the two proton doublets at 7.85 and 7.63 ppm, which are assumed to coalesce at 323 K (Fig. 2), yields a free energy of activation of 67 kJ mol À1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coalescence temperatures for the signals at 36.7 pprn and 66.5 pprn at -50 f 5°C and -57 * 5°C and chemical shift differences of 56.1 and 126.9 Hz, respectively, were used to calculate rate constants at coalescence of 191.1 and 84.5 s-I, respectively, by means of the method of ShananAtidi and Bar-Eli for unequally populated sites (25). Fractional populations for the two sites of 0.67 and 0.33 were used.…”
Section: Solution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectral Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%