2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2012.00741
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A converse to Lieb-Robinson bounds in one dimension using index theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1D, QCA are equivalent to matrix-product unitaries 212 and are fully classified by a topological invariant called (chiral) index, 213 which is quantized as log Q + and is additive upon tensoring and composition. While there are several ways to define the index for a 1D QCA Û , one elegant definition is given by the following entropy formula: 214,215,216…”
Section: Specific Lower Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1D, QCA are equivalent to matrix-product unitaries 212 and are fully classified by a topological invariant called (chiral) index, 213 which is quantized as log Q + and is additive upon tensoring and composition. While there are several ways to define the index for a 1D QCA Û , one elegant definition is given by the following entropy formula: 214,215,216…”
Section: Specific Lower Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10], is that QCA are fully classified by a genuinely dynamical topological index. This result was recently generalized to include the more realistic case where the causal cone is only approximate [17]. Importantly, this topological index is zero if and only if the evolution is generated by a (quasi-)local Hamiltonian.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although the index was initially defined in terms of abstract operator algebras [10], an equivalent definition, which reflects an intuitive picture of quantum-information flow [7,16,17], was recently put forward. In turn, this made it possible to establish a lower bound on quantum scrambling in terms of the index, building a bridge between genuinely dynamical topological invariants and quantum chaos [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 They originally arose in the context of quantum simulation and as a model for quantum computation [1][2][3][4][5]. However, in recent years, QCAs have seen wide-ranging applications from discretized quantum field theories [6,7] to the classification of Floquet phases [8][9][10][11][12][13] and tensor network unitary operators [14][15][16][17][18], entanglement growth in quantum dynamics [19][20][21][22], and the construction of symmetry-protected topological states and their anomalous boundaries [23,24]. Beyond such applications, QCAs represent a fundamental class of mathematical objects in the quantum many-body setting, meshing the notions of unitarity and locality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%