2019
DOI: 10.3390/sym11091106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Convex Combination Approach for Mean-Based Variants of Newton’s Method

Abstract: Several authors have designed variants of Newton’s method for solving nonlinear equations by using different means. This technique involves a symmetry in the corresponding fixed-point operator. In this paper, some known results about mean-based variants of Newton’s method (MBN) are re-analyzed from the point of view of convex combinations. A new test is developed to study the order of convergence of general MBN. Furthermore, a generalization of the Lehmer mean is proposed and discussed. Numerical tests are pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observe that for α = 1.0 (RNM) the following values of parameters were obtained: ANI = 179.9, CAI = 0.98, time = 0.68 s, whereas for α = 20.47 ANI parameter obtained minimal value 5.41 when CAI = 1.0 and time = 0.025 s. This means that the M-RNM for α = 20.47 has attained the best improvement in comparison to the RNM-the number of iterations was reduced 33 times and time reduction was 27 times with CAI close to 1.0. Similar behaviour occurs on the flat parts of ANI and CAI plots for α values roughly in the range [10,30]. When α > 40.0 random fading oscillations are seen, what means that the M-RNM loses its stability and stops working properly.…”
Section: Variable α Sequencesupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Observe that for α = 1.0 (RNM) the following values of parameters were obtained: ANI = 179.9, CAI = 0.98, time = 0.68 s, whereas for α = 20.47 ANI parameter obtained minimal value 5.41 when CAI = 1.0 and time = 0.025 s. This means that the M-RNM for α = 20.47 has attained the best improvement in comparison to the RNM-the number of iterations was reduced 33 times and time reduction was 27 times with CAI close to 1.0. Similar behaviour occurs on the flat parts of ANI and CAI plots for α values roughly in the range [10,30]. When α > 40.0 random fading oscillations are seen, what means that the M-RNM loses its stability and stops working properly.…”
Section: Variable α Sequencesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…By looking at this formula, we can observe that at the (i +1)-th iteration the M-RNM moves z i into the direction given by vector After including (10) into (16), we obtain the following:…”
Section: Algorithm 2: Computation Of N Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation