2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04174-7_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Convex Method for Locating Regions of Interest with Multi-instance Learning

Abstract: Abstract. In content-based image retrieval (CBIR) and image screening, it is often desirable to locate the regions of interest (ROI) in the images automatically. This can be accomplished with multi-instance learning techniques by treating each image as a bag of instances (regions). Many SVM-based methods are successful in predicting the bag labels, however, few of them can locate the ROIs. Moreover, they are often based on either local search or an EM-style strategy, and may get stuck in local minima easily. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We briefly discuss two interesting approaches. In (Li et al, 2009), the CBIR problem is particularly considered where the regions of interest can be seen as witnesses or key instances in positive bags. They formed a convex optimization problem iteratively by finding violated key instances and combining them via multiple kernel learning.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We briefly discuss two interesting approaches. In (Li et al, 2009), the CBIR problem is particularly considered where the regions of interest can be seen as witnesses or key instances in positive bags. They formed a convex optimization problem iteratively by finding violated key instances and combining them via multiple kernel learning.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instances classified as positive are the witnesses. KI-SVM [4] also locates ROI by finding the key instance (i.e. witness) in bags using multiple kernel learning.…”
Section: Witness Identification In Mil Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some of these methods, like MILES [5] and Citation-kNN [15], can be adapted for the task. In contrast, instance-based MIL methods like axis parallel rectangle (APR) [2], mi-SVM, MI-SVM [3] and KI-SVM [4] infer bag labels based on individual instance classification, and thus can be used directly for witness identification. Although these methods can achieve a high level of performance in specific situations, they often perform poorly when the proportion of positive instances in positive bags, hereafter called the witness rate (WR), is low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, we report the classification accuracies averaged over 10 runs where the parameter selection is carried our by using 10-fold cross validation. Our results are shown in Table 2 together with those of 12 other MIL algorithms in the literature [13,8,4,5,10,12,14,1,24]. All reported results are also based on 10-fold CV averaged over 10 runs 4 , with the exception of MIForest, which is over 5 runs, and MILIS and MIO, which are over 15 runs.…”
Section: Benchmark Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, it is more important to note that it gives the best performance among the instance-selection based MIL approaches. [12] 88.3 87.7 n/a n/a n/a Ins-KI-SVM [14] 84 Table 2. Classification accuracies of various MIL algorithms on standard benchmark data sets.…”
Section: Benchmark Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%