2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0041423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A convolutional neural network algorithm for breast tumor detection with magnetic detection electrical impedance tomography

Abstract: Breast cancer is a malignant tumor disease for which early detection, diagnosis, and treatment are of paramount significance in prolonging the life of patients. Magnetic Detection Electrical Impedance Tomography (MDEIT) based on the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), which aims to realize non-invasive, high resolution detection of breast tumors, is proposed. First, the MDEIT forward problem of the coronal and horizontal planes of the breast was simulated and solved using the Finite Element Method to obtain sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, by comparing the training results and test results of the CNN algorithm, RNN algorithm, and DNN algorithm, it was found that there was no significant difference between the training results and test results of the CNN algorithm (P > 0.05), while there was significant difference between the two results of DNN algorithm and RNN algorithm (P < 0.05), suggesting that the stability of CNN performance was higher than that of RNN and DNN algorithms. Chen et al [23] mentioned that the CNN algorithm had good stability in application testing. Xu et al [24] also proposed that the recognition accuracy and stability of the CNN algorithm were better than those of recognition methods based on time domain and frequency domain characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, by comparing the training results and test results of the CNN algorithm, RNN algorithm, and DNN algorithm, it was found that there was no significant difference between the training results and test results of the CNN algorithm (P > 0.05), while there was significant difference between the two results of DNN algorithm and RNN algorithm (P < 0.05), suggesting that the stability of CNN performance was higher than that of RNN and DNN algorithms. Chen et al [23] mentioned that the CNN algorithm had good stability in application testing. Xu et al [24] also proposed that the recognition accuracy and stability of the CNN algorithm were better than those of recognition methods based on time domain and frequency domain characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al introduced a CNN-based algorithm for the non-invasive and high-resolution detection of breast tumors through Magnetic Detection Electrical Impedance Tomography. The results indicated that the relative reconstruction error with the CNN algorithm could be reduced to 10% compared to the Truncated Singular Value Decomposition algorithm and the Backpropagation algorithm [30]. Li et al proposed a Densely Connected Convolutional Neural Network to improve image reconstruction in Electrical Resistance Tomography, effectively mitigating the issues of information and gradient vanishing and significantly enhancing the accuracy and visual quality of the reconstructed images [31].…”
Section: Convolution Patterns In Emt: a Projection-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNN is a typical feed-forward neural network used to extract data containing spatial information, such as image and video recognition and classification [24]. The CNN comprises the convolutional, pooling, and fully connected layers.…”
Section: F Cnnmentioning
confidence: 99%