1988
DOI: 10.1016/0097-3165(88)90070-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coordinatization of generalized quadrangles of order (s, s + 2)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these results have already been obtained by De Soete and Thas [4], who define a (0, 2)-set in 5? to be a non-empty set SB of pairwise non-collinear points such that IX 1 n 38\ e {0, 2} for all X e & \ B §.…”
Section: Lemma 22 Let S3 Be a Partial Blt-sef In The Generalised Qumentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of these results have already been obtained by De Soete and Thas [4], who define a (0, 2)-set in 5? to be a non-empty set SB of pairwise non-collinear points such that IX 1 n 38\ e {0, 2} for all X e & \ B §.…”
Section: Lemma 22 Let S3 Be a Partial Blt-sef In The Generalised Qumentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Here we consider a number of generalisations of BLT-sets of Q(4, q), q odd: to BLT-sets of H (3, q 2 ), q odd, in Section 5; to BLT-sets of T*(^), in Section 6; to BLT-sets of finite generalised quadrangles in general, in Section 2; to BLT-sets of the polar spaces Q(2n, q), q odd, of rank n > 2, in Section 7. The material in Section 2 is related to work of De Soete and Thas [4], predating the introduction of BLT-sets of Q(4, q) in Bader, Lunardon and Thas [2] by six years. While we note the advances of Shult and Thas [14] in Section 3, we restrict ourselves to BLT-sets of points, rather than sets of subspaces with the BLT-property.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of this latter theorem is implicitly contained in [6] and [1]. However, as the final step in the proof of our main theorem uses this construction, we sketch it here.…”
Section: Theorem 13 Let P Be a Gq Of Order (S − 1 S + 1) With A Regmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The case where S is a spread of symmetry of a GQ Q of order (s, s + 2) has already been considered in [11].…”
Section: The Case T = S +mentioning
confidence: 99%