“…A set of recent reports illustrates deoxygenation of NO 3 – at relatively less oxophilic transition metal sites (e.g., Co and Ni) typically in the presence of a wide range of oxophilic reagents including CO, (Bpin) 2 (pyrazine), and VCl 3 . − While the reduction of NO 3 – at late transition metal sites remains rare and commonly realized with the usage of oxophilic reagents, − the developments of metal-based NO 3 – reducing processes are challenging due to weakly coordinating and the chemically inert nature of NO 3 – . In contrast, NO 2 – anion exhibits stronger binding affinity toward metal and offers more diverse reactivity patterns in comparison to NO 3 – . − Accordingly, the reductions of nitrite at metal sites have been demonstrated in the presence of a wide range of reducing agents including thiols, − H 2 S, phosphines, − phenols, − and ene-diols. − It is noteworthy that the reaction of hydrazine (N 2 H 4 ) and nitrate in the presence of copper(II) salts has been known in the literature for several decades. , More specifically, N 2 H 4 in alkaline conditions leads to copper(II)-mediated transformation of nitrate to nitrite in good yield, thereby enabling estimation of nitrate in water samples . While these results highlight the suitability of N 2 H 4 as a reductant for nitrate and the importance of copper(II) salts, several factors such as pH, temperature, time, ultrasonic irradiation, and reaction stoichiometry have been known to affect the efficiency of the reductive transformation. , In the absence of molecular-level insights into the N 2 H 4 reactions of NO x – anions at the copper(II) site, this reaction remains poorly understood.…”