2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta03518d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A copper single-atom catalyst towards efficient and durable oxygen reduction for fuel cells

Abstract: Cu single-atom catalysts could be promising non-noble catalysts towards oxygen reduction for fuel cell applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
114
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
114
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the experimental explanation on active species of Cu-SACs for ORR is still severely dependent on X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and EXAFS without better techniques. Among them, the carbon-hosted CuN 4 moiety has been proposed to be considered as an active center of Cu-SACs [ 27 29 , 31 , 32 ], based on the coordination number (4) of Cu in the microstructure. Nevertheless, with a computational hydrogen electrode (CHE) model, the well-established Cu-SAC model with CuN 4 center possesses rather inferior ORR activity to Pt(111) according to the theoretical onset potential (0.25~0.43 V vs. 0.79 V) [ 27 , 28 , 31 – 33 ], which indicates that the atomic-level understanding on the active center of Cu-SACs boosting ORR remains controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the experimental explanation on active species of Cu-SACs for ORR is still severely dependent on X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and EXAFS without better techniques. Among them, the carbon-hosted CuN 4 moiety has been proposed to be considered as an active center of Cu-SACs [ 27 29 , 31 , 32 ], based on the coordination number (4) of Cu in the microstructure. Nevertheless, with a computational hydrogen electrode (CHE) model, the well-established Cu-SAC model with CuN 4 center possesses rather inferior ORR activity to Pt(111) according to the theoretical onset potential (0.25~0.43 V vs. 0.79 V) [ 27 , 28 , 31 – 33 ], which indicates that the atomic-level understanding on the active center of Cu-SACs boosting ORR remains controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the carbon-hosted CuN 4 moiety has been proposed to be considered as an active center of Cu-SACs [ 27 29 , 31 , 32 ], based on the coordination number (4) of Cu in the microstructure. Nevertheless, with a computational hydrogen electrode (CHE) model, the well-established Cu-SAC model with CuN 4 center possesses rather inferior ORR activity to Pt(111) according to the theoretical onset potential (0.25~0.43 V vs. 0.79 V) [ 27 , 28 , 31 – 33 ], which indicates that the atomic-level understanding on the active center of Cu-SACs boosting ORR remains controversial. More importantly, previous studies demonstrated that numerous catalysts experienced reconstruction during the test operation, probably originating from some physical and chemical aspects, such as pH, potential polarization, and adsorbates [ 34 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides Fe and Co SAs, copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) SAs were also reported to show remarkable electrocatalytic activities. [95][96][97][98][99][100] Similar to the preparation of Fe and Co SAs, the precursor strategy has also been widely employed for preparing Cu and Zn SAs. For instance, abundant Cu SA active sites were prepared through the pyrolysis of Cu-based organic precursors mixed with dicyandiamide.…”
Section: Orrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon nanotubes have also been used as a substrate for single‐atom Cu catalyst, for example in 2019 Xiang and co‐workers pyrolyzed Cu phthalocyanine in combination with oxidized carbon nanotubes producing Cu–N x moieties. The observed Cu species were in line with other publications, where Cu + and Cu 2+ forms Cu–N 2 or Cu–N 4 sites.…”
Section: Non‐cobalt‐ or Iron‐based Electrocatalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%