ObjectivesTo assess the completeness of history-taking
and physical-examination notes of junior doctors at King Abdulaziz University
Hospital per the approach they learned in medical school.
MethodsIn this retrospective study, we reviewed 860
admission notes written by 269 junior doctors (interns and residents) in an
academic tertiary-care medical centre in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, over a two-month
period. Notes were evaluated for completeness using a checklist developed with
reference to relevant medical textbooks. The checklist included 32 items related
to history-taking and physical examination. Based on the review of the notes,
checklist items were evaluated as complete, incomplete, not present, or not
applicable according to set criteria. Data were analysed and summarised for
information on the frequency and relative frequency of these types.
ResultsThe history items
varied in completeness. At the
high end, asking about chief complaint and duration, associated symptoms,
aggravating and relieving factors, and conducting systemic review were marked
‘complete’ in 74.2%, 81.7%, 80.4%, and 79.7% of notes, respectively. At the low
end, asking about previous episodes, allergies, medications, and family history
were complete in 5.3%, 1.9%, 4.8%, and 2.9% of notes, respectively. All
physical examination items were poorly documented, especially breast
examination, which was ‘not present’ in 95.8% of the notes.
ConclusionsJunior
doctors’ history and physical-examination notes are often incomplete and do not
follow the approach taught in medical school. The reasons for this must be
studied via focus-group discussions with junior doctors.