2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2018.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A corpus-based analysis of grammatical complexity as a measure of international teaching assistants’ oral English proficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research showed the effectiveness of implementing corpus-informed materials, either indirect or direct application (DDL) in many areas. To take for example, language teaching and learning (Flowerdew 2017), language assessment (Huang et al 2018;Taylor and Barker 2008;Xi 2017;Kong 2017;Thirakunkovit et al 2019), needs analysis for material development, (Staples 2019;Karpenko-Seccombe 2018), feedback and error correction (Crosthwaite 2017), register and lexis (Crosthwaite, Wong, and Cheung 2019), teaching grammar (Lin 2021) and vocabulary in ESP context (Đurović and Bauk 2022). Despite the growing interest in corpus-informed material, little is known about how corpusinformed material are designed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research showed the effectiveness of implementing corpus-informed materials, either indirect or direct application (DDL) in many areas. To take for example, language teaching and learning (Flowerdew 2017), language assessment (Huang et al 2018;Taylor and Barker 2008;Xi 2017;Kong 2017;Thirakunkovit et al 2019), needs analysis for material development, (Staples 2019;Karpenko-Seccombe 2018), feedback and error correction (Crosthwaite 2017), register and lexis (Crosthwaite, Wong, and Cheung 2019), teaching grammar (Lin 2021) and vocabulary in ESP context (Đurović and Bauk 2022). Despite the growing interest in corpus-informed material, little is known about how corpusinformed material are designed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%