2018
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.13034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cost‐and‐time effective procedure to develop SNP markers for multiple species: A support for community genetics

Abstract: Multispecies population genetics is an emerging field that provides insight relevant to conservation biology and community ecology. However, to date, this approach is limited to species with available genetic resources. The use of thousands of single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers developed from recent genotyping‐by‐sequencing (GBS) technologies is a roadmap for the study of nonmodel species, but remains cost prohibitive when several, distantly related species are involved. We aimed to overcome this iss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We acknowledge that potential genotyping and sex‐identification error can also be introduced by pooling males and females, and the biases in pooled approaches, especially in allele frequency determination, is well recognised (Gautier et al., 2013; Rellstab, Zoller, Tedder, Gugerli, & Fischer, 2013). However, pooled‐based approaches have shown great promise for delineating diversity in species lacking reference genomes (Kurland et al., 2019; Neethiraj, Hornett, Hill, & Wheat, 2017), and, moreover, pool‐RAD‐seq approaches have been used to successfully identify species‐specific SNPs across a range of species (Delord et al., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acknowledge that potential genotyping and sex‐identification error can also be introduced by pooling males and females, and the biases in pooled approaches, especially in allele frequency determination, is well recognised (Gautier et al., 2013; Rellstab, Zoller, Tedder, Gugerli, & Fischer, 2013). However, pooled‐based approaches have shown great promise for delineating diversity in species lacking reference genomes (Kurland et al., 2019; Neethiraj, Hornett, Hill, & Wheat, 2017), and, moreover, pool‐RAD‐seq approaches have been used to successfully identify species‐specific SNPs across a range of species (Delord et al., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should aim to go bigger and characterize spatial patterns of intraspecific diversity at the whole riverscape metacommunity level. Recent advances in high‐throughput sequencing and bioinformatics allow conducting fast biodiversity assessments by massively sequencing molecular markers from multiple species at affordable costs (Delord et al, 2018; Lepais et al, 2019). It is thus becoming possible to rapidly identify species composing riverine communities while estimating the intraspecific (genetic) diversity of all the species forming these communities (e.g., using DNA metabarcoding techniques; Elbrecht, Vamos, Steinke, & Leese, 2018).…”
Section: Patterns Of Intraspecific Diversity In Riverscapes: From Obsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population information including connectivity across species distribution range, exchange rate and source-sink dynamics are important for understanding potential impacts of bio-physical factors [2831], human-induced fragmentation [32] and pollution [33,34], or overexploitation [3537]. Among the wide-range of molecular approaches, restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) is well known for its ability to identify and score thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which are randomly distributed across the target genomes using next generation sequencing [3840]. RAD methods are being used and developed with many techniques such as mbRAD [41], 2b-RAD [42], ddRAD [38] and ezRAD [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%