2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12975-015-0386-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cost-Effective Rabbit Embolic Stroke Bioassay: Insight into the Development of Acute Ischemic Stroke Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it would be relevant to study the therapeutic time window in the rabbit small clot embolic stroke model, in which the efficacy of the only marketed drug against ischemic stroke, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), has been correlated with its effects in humans (Lapchak, 2010). This model also allows studies of the effect of combinations of UCCB01-144 and tPA on efficacy, safety, and therapeutic dose-and time window (Lapchak, 2015;Lapchak and Araujo, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it would be relevant to study the therapeutic time window in the rabbit small clot embolic stroke model, in which the efficacy of the only marketed drug against ischemic stroke, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), has been correlated with its effects in humans (Lapchak, 2010). This model also allows studies of the effect of combinations of UCCB01-144 and tPA on efficacy, safety, and therapeutic dose-and time window (Lapchak, 2015;Lapchak and Araujo, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must pointed out that aged 24-month old rodents purchased from standard animal facilities cost in the range of $700-1500 per animal depending on gender, and with a standard study incorporating 20-40 rodents per gender can cost $100,000 for animals alone [30]. The options for research include the standardized rabbit embolic stroke model used in the development of tPA [17,27,28,35], and non-human primates (NHPs) recently used for the development of PSD-95 antagonists [36,37]. However, the principal investigator of the PSD-95 inhibitor studies, Dr. Tymianski stated that there is no evidence that NHPs are necessary or essential for translational stroke research.…”
Section: Noteworthy Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the development of neuroprotective compounds has been fraught with problems, in particular, the lack of efficacy in many stroke clinical trials. There are many reasons for this failure, and they have been reviewed in detail elsewhere [12,[16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are established rodent, rabbit and primate embolism models that can be used to develop novel neuroprotective strategies [11, 12, 6972, 16, 15, 14]. Of importance to modeling stroke for stroke therapy research and development, there may be a need to include glycemic variability [7375], age [76], gender/sex [77], and hypertension [76], but there are still no FDA-approved neuroprotectives to document the best path forward, nor is there critical data demonstrating that extensive studies in animals with comorbidities are required for success (see also [12]. With the discoveries described above, early intervention was best (within 6 hours) and recommendations are made to prevent any delay in treating the stroke victim [16, 36].…”
Section: C) Neuroprotection: On the Horizon?mentioning
confidence: 99%