2018
DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.3.166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cost-effectiveness analysis of a hydration response technology dressing in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in the UK

Abstract: Clinical benefits and cost savings increase when real-life practice assumptions, based on expert opinion, are included. Based on the underlying health economic model, HRDT is more effective and less costly than other comparative products in VLUs in the UK.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common intervention type across the studies was dressings for VLUs, the subject of 11 studies (48%) [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. There were also four studies each focusing on compression bandaging [35][36][37][38] and extracellular matrices [39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The most common intervention type across the studies was dressings for VLUs, the subject of 11 studies (48%) [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. There were also four studies each focusing on compression bandaging [35][36][37][38] and extracellular matrices [39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten of the studies (43%) were published in the Journal of Wound Care [24-27, 35-37, 39, 43, 45], with no other journal responsible for more than one paper. There were 11 cost effectiveness analyses (CEAs) [26, 28-33, 35, 40-42] and three cost utility analyses (CUAs) [25,36,38], with the remaining nine studies a combination of both CEA and CUA [24,27,34,37,39,[43][44][45][46]. For the CEAs, the most common clinical outcome related to percentage of patients healed (12 outcomes) [26,27,30,32,33,37,39,[41][42][43][44][45], with time taken for the ulcer to heal used as an outcome in ten studies [24, 25, 29, 31, 34-36, 41, 42, 46], and reduction in wound area size used twice [28,29].…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations