1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980501)82:9<1632::aid-cncr6>3.3.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cost‐effectiveness analysis of colorectal screening for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma gene carriers

Abstract: CRC surveillance of HNPCC gene carriers appears to be effective and considerably less costly than no CRC surveillance and therefore deserves to be supported by governmental agencies and health insurance organizations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Vasen et al [39] have estimated that colonoscopic surveillance of gene carriers leads to an increase in life expectancy of 7 years and that the costs of surveillance are less than the costs of the treatment of tumours diagnosed on the burns of symptoms. Identification of true mutation carriers by mutation analysis and predictive testing of high-risk members has been shown to be cost-effective compared to the life-long screening of all family members at risk, especially in large families [40].…”
Section: The Cost-effectiveness Of Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vasen et al [39] have estimated that colonoscopic surveillance of gene carriers leads to an increase in life expectancy of 7 years and that the costs of surveillance are less than the costs of the treatment of tumours diagnosed on the burns of symptoms. Identification of true mutation carriers by mutation analysis and predictive testing of high-risk members has been shown to be cost-effective compared to the life-long screening of all family members at risk, especially in large families [40].…”
Section: The Cost-effectiveness Of Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent study by Dinh et al [16] showed that primary screening by genetic testing for risk assessment in unaffected individuals could be cost-effective as compared to current practice based on clinical risk criteria after a malignancy was detected. Some studies [21,22] dealt with mutation carriers only in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of different surveillance programs, while some [23] focused on the cost-effectiveness of including moderate risk families for genetic testing and surveillance programs. There is only one study by Breheny [24] that specifically addressed the impact of genetic testing among asymptomatic first-degree relatives of known mutation carriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of a high incidence and an early age at onset of cancer, targeted surveillance programmes are recommended. Early detection and removal of precancerous adenomas and early-stage cancers significantly reduce the colorectal cancer burden and has demonstrated favourable cost efficacy [23,24]. The need for initiation of surveillance at early age, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%