1983
DOI: 10.1080/05695558308974633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cost-Minimization Model for Multicharacteristic Component Inspection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Choosing between these two policies depends on the tradeoff between scrapping costs and outgoing quality; see also Ding and Gong (2008) and Quinino et al (2010) for variations of this problem. Sequencing issues and imperfect testing have both been considered in the inspection of multi-characteristic components; we refer to Raouf et al (1983), Schmidt and Bennett (1972) and Tang and Tang (1994) for examples. The results in the foregoing references, however, do not apply for the case where retesting is not allowed or economically infeasible.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Choosing between these two policies depends on the tradeoff between scrapping costs and outgoing quality; see also Ding and Gong (2008) and Quinino et al (2010) for variations of this problem. Sequencing issues and imperfect testing have both been considered in the inspection of multi-characteristic components; we refer to Raouf et al (1983), Schmidt and Bennett (1972) and Tang and Tang (1994) for examples. The results in the foregoing references, however, do not apply for the case where retesting is not allowed or economically infeasible.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the tests are imperfect, however, applying the same test multiple times can be useful for obtaining higher outgoing quality and economic savings. Raouf et al (1983) develop a model where accepted components are repetitively retested, and they determine the optimal number of repeat inspections for multi-characteristic components to minimize the total expected cost per accepted component due to type-I error, type-II error and cost of inspection. Greenberg and Stokes (1995) use the data acquired from retesting rejected items to estimate the probability of testing errors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khan et al (2011a) reviewed the studies that have extended the EOQ model for imperfect items set forth by Salameh and Jaber (2000). Khan et al (2011b) used the models of Salameh and Jaber (2000) and Raouf et al (1983) to determine an inventory policy for imperfect items subject to Type I and Type II inspection errors. The defective items classified by the inspector and those returned from the market are accumulated and sold at a discounted price at the end of the 100% screening process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duffuaa and Khan (2002) proposed a general inspection plan for quality assurance of critical multi-characteristic components. They extended the Raouf et al(1983) inspection plan for the case of six types of misclassification errors, where an inspector could classify an item to be good, rework or scrap. Duffuaa and Khan (2005) carried out a sensitivity analysis to investigate the statistical and economic impact of the several types of misclassification errors on the performance measures of the inspection plan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raouf et al(1983) studied human errors in inspection. They came up with one of the first inspection plans with misclassifications for multi-characteristic critical components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%