2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cost-Utility Analysis Of Raasi Enabling-Patiromer In Patients With Hyperkalemia

Abstract: SA showed lower cost per responder for SFOH, when relative PB was varied, for both countries. The average annual cost-savings of preventing one patient from switching to IV from oral VDRAs were EUR217 (Belgium) and EUR72 (Netherlands). ConClusions: SFOH appears to attain in-range sPhos at a lower cost compared to SEV and may result in additional cost-savings due to less patients switching from oral to costlier IV VDRAs, suggesting favorable cost-effectiveness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, it has been demonstrated by mathematical models that hyperkalemia prevention and treatment with patiromer is a potentially cost-effective intervention for the long-term maintenance of RAASi in patients at risk of hyperkalemia [82].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, it has been demonstrated by mathematical models that hyperkalemia prevention and treatment with patiromer is a potentially cost-effective intervention for the long-term maintenance of RAASi in patients at risk of hyperkalemia [82].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Nonetheless, cost considerations of this new therapy, especially in the long-term for patients with chronic HK, may influence clinical practice and subsidy recommendations. While several cost-effectiveness studies on patiromer (another new potassium binder agent) demonstrated costeffectiveness when compared with established benchmarks from the United States and European healthcare system perspectives, [14][15][16][17] studies on SZC are relatively scarce. Only one recent study on SZC showed it to be cost-effective from the perspective of Scandinavian healthcare systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patiromer significantly lowers P-potassium in patients with CKD 31 32. Several studies have proposed the use of patiromer to allow for increased RAAS blockade in patients with hyperkalaemia, CKD and suboptimal RAAS blockade treatment 33. Hyperkalaemia may be addressed through dietary restrictions, but these have limited effect, a profound impact on patient’s lifestyle and freedom and limit the intake of healthy fresh fruits and vegetables 34…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%