1981
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(81)90554-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A counter example to the Bloch-Nordsieck theorem in non-abelian gauge theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
61
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In theories with massless charged particles, such as QCD, the cancellation of infrared singularities (soft and collinear) is significantly more subtle. The Bloch-Nordsieck theorem fails in QCD: summing inclusively over final state gluon radiation is insufficient to cancel all infrared singularities, even if the initial state consists only of massive quarks [23][24][25][26]. Nevertheless, even in QCD infrared divergences can be shown to cancel in certain contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theories with massless charged particles, such as QCD, the cancellation of infrared singularities (soft and collinear) is significantly more subtle. The Bloch-Nordsieck theorem fails in QCD: summing inclusively over final state gluon radiation is insufficient to cancel all infrared singularities, even if the initial state consists only of massive quarks [23][24][25][26]. Nevertheless, even in QCD infrared divergences can be shown to cancel in certain contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this is twofold: on the technical side such calculations are uncommon and technically challenging [52]. On the conceptual side, even if one makes the effort to compute a cross-section with full mass dependence for initial-state massive quarks and then subtracts all quasi-collinear singularities as appropriate for a massless MS subtraction, it is known that collinear factorization is violated starting at NNLO with two initial state massive fermions [53][54][55]. More about this topic can be found in the textbook by Collins [56, section 14.6].…”
Section: Is the Value Of µ B A Matter Of Choice Or Part Of The Theorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far all calculations tend to calculate the next-to-leading twist correction to LO or NLO process. As such there is not conflict with the known violation of factorization at higher twist [108,109].…”
Section: Upcoming Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 89%