2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00233-001-0170-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A counterexample to Sorenson’s conjecture: The finitely generated case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For finitely generated semigroups in absolute generality, it is well known that left FC does not imply left amenability ( [16], or see [34,Section 4.22] for a more accessible reference) and that left amenability does not imply left SFC (due to an example of [38] which is a refinement to the finitely generated case of a result of Klawe [29]). We have seen that the existence of an element of maximal local cogrowth does not imply left amenability (see Remark 6.16 above), and therefore nor does maximal global cogrowth, or the associated random walk Markov operator having a norm or spectral radius of at least 1.…”
Section: Argabright and Wilde [1]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For finitely generated semigroups in absolute generality, it is well known that left FC does not imply left amenability ( [16], or see [34,Section 4.22] for a more accessible reference) and that left amenability does not imply left SFC (due to an example of [38] which is a refinement to the finitely generated case of a result of Klawe [29]). We have seen that the existence of an element of maximal local cogrowth does not imply left amenability (see Remark 6.16 above), and therefore nor does maximal global cogrowth, or the associated random walk Markov operator having a norm or spectral radius of at least 1.…”
Section: Argabright and Wilde [1]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus so far has been chiefly on the finite case (most notably on face monoids of hyperplane arrangements), but the extension to finitely generated semigroups is arguably the next natural step. Finally, amenability for semigroups has been an active area of research from the 1950s [12] to the present day; see [2,3,4,10,23] for some examples of recent developments and applications in other areas and [18,38] for advances relating specifically to finitely generated semigroups. It therefore seems apposite to ask whether whether the concept of cogrowth makes sense in a semigroup setting, and if so whether it is capable of forming a similar bridge between these areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stronger form ("the strong Følner condition" or SFC ) was considered by Argabright and Wilde [1]; they showed that SFC is sufficient for left amenability, and that necessity would follow from a conjecture of Sorenson [18,19], asserting that every right cancellative, left amenable semigroup was also left cancellative. Subsequently, Klawe [15] showed that necessity was actually equivalent to Sorenson's conjecture, before disproving both, by producing a (non-finitely-generated) example of a left amenable semigroup which was right but not left cancellative; this was subsequently refined to a finitely generated example by Takahashi [20]. Despite considerable further work in this area (see for example [23]), an elementary combinatorial characterisation of (left or two-sided) amenability for semigroups remains elusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%