2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.10.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coupled extractive-oxidative process for desulfurization of gasoline and diesel fuels using a bifunctional ionic liquid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protons of the imidazolium ring are observed at δ = 7.85 (d, 1H), 7.93 (d, 1H), and 9.48 ppm (s, 1H). [20] The 13 C NMR spectrum of [OMIM]Br/FeCl 3 displays twelve strong signals ( Figure S2, Supporting Information). The set of the upfield signals (δ = 22.52-31.63) and δ = 14.34 ppm are attributed to the À CH 2 and À CH 3 groups of the octyl side chain, respectively.…”
Section: Characterization Of [Omim]br/feclmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The protons of the imidazolium ring are observed at δ = 7.85 (d, 1H), 7.93 (d, 1H), and 9.48 ppm (s, 1H). [20] The 13 C NMR spectrum of [OMIM]Br/FeCl 3 displays twelve strong signals ( Figure S2, Supporting Information). The set of the upfield signals (δ = 22.52-31.63) and δ = 14.34 ppm are attributed to the À CH 2 and À CH 3 groups of the octyl side chain, respectively.…”
Section: Characterization Of [Omim]br/feclmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three downfield signals (δ = 122.71, 123.97, and 137.01 ppm) are ascribed to the À CH aromatic substituents of the imidazolium ring. [20] The FTIR spectrum of [OMIM]Br/FeCl 3 is shown in Figure 1. The stretching vibration bands of CÀ N, C=C, and C=N are observed at 1163, 1566, and 1646 cm À 1 , respectively.…”
Section: Characterization Of [Omim]br/feclmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, HDS is costly since it requires industrial units operating at high temperatures (>300 °C), pressure (3-10 MPa), and volume of hydrogen gas, with expensive catalysts and low energy efficiency (Kaisy, et al, 2016;Jiang et al, 2016;Zaid et al, 2017). Many of these limitations could be solved by developing desulfurization methods involving adsorption (Shah et al, 2016;Mirshra et al, 2017), oxidative desulphurization (Rezvani et al, 2017;Hitam et al, 2018), bio-desulfurization (Martínez et al, 2017;Paixão et al, 2016), microwave assisted desulphurization, ultrasound (Taheri-Shakib et al, 2017;Mozafari and Nasri, 2017), and extractive desulphurization (Safa et al, 2016;Elwan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the homogeneous desulfurization system, heterogeneous desulfurization system has more advantages. In homogeneous desulfurization, the excess use of ionic liquid acting as the catalyst for high desulfurization rates may contribute to an increase in cost (Elwan et al 2017;Rodríguez-Cabo et al 2014). But when the ionic liquid was supported on a carrier first and then participated in ODS, the same performance could be easily achieved with less ionic liquid in the formed heterogeneous system (Pham et al 2018;Khan et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%